Judge Won't Dismiss Case Objecting to NJ Township's Mosque Settlement
A federal judge has denied a motion by Bernards Township, New Jersey, to dismiss a suit objecting to its 2017 settlement of litigation over construction of a mosque.
April 30, 2018 at 05:55 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has denied a motion by Bernards Township, New Jersey, to dismiss a suit objecting to its 2017 settlement of litigation over construction of a mosque.
The objections were brought by plaintiffs backed by a legal organization that said the accord violates the establishment clause by favoring one religious group, Muslims, and not others, including Christians.
The Somerset County township's motion to dismiss is denied because it did not meet its burden to demonstrate that the plaintiffs have failed to state claims to permit dismissal of the First Amendment suit filed against it, U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp of the District of New Jersey ruled Monday in Quick v. Township of Bernards.
The suit raises constitutional claims against the previous settlement between the township and a group whose request to construct a mosque was denied. The settlement calls for a public hearing to be conducted on the mosque plans but participants would be barred from offering questions or comments at the meeting on Islam or Muslims.
The suit seeks a declaration that the plaintiffs' rights are being violated, a declaration that the settlement is unconstitutional,
The plaintiffs claim the subject of the group's religious practices is relevant because members will visit the mosque to pray at various times of day, potentially creating parking and traffic problems.
A plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction was denied in August
Bernards agreed to pay $3.25 million last year to settle a previous suit brought by the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge, which claimed that its application to build a new mosque was turned down out of religious animus. That case was settled in June of 2017, but two months later the town was hit with a pair of additional suits.
The suit by Christopher and Loretta Quick brings the First Amendment claim over the alleged free speech restrictions. A second suit, brought by Cody Smith in state court in Somerset County, claims that the Township Council violated the state Open Public Meetings Act by voting to approve the settlement before disclosing its terms to residents.
Both suits are brought with backing from the Thomas More Law Center—whose mission statement includes “defend[ing] the religious freedom of Christians”—which has accused Bernards of anti-Christian bias in its settlement of the prior litigation.
Eric Harrison of Methfessel & Werbel in Edison, New Jersey, whose firm represents Bernards in both cases, declined to comment on the litigation. Westfield, New Jersey, attorney Michael Hrycak, who represents the plaintiffs, did not return a call.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLowenstein Hires Ex-FTX US General Counsel Ryne Miller to Lead Its Commodities, Derivatives Practice
3 minute readDrugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
4 minute readMany Lawyers Are Reeling From Election Results, but Leaders Are Staying Mum
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250