Data Breach That Revealed Client File Sparks Legal Malpractice Action
A matrimonial attorney and her firm are facing a malpractice suit in state Superior Court in Morris County, New Jersey, after litigation over a divorce was disrupted by a data breach.
May 01, 2018 at 05:33 PM
4 minute read
A matrimonial attorney and her firm are facing a malpractice suit in state Superior Court in Morris County, New Jersey, after litigation over a divorce was disrupted by a data breach.
The complaint said attorney Erin Brueche, who represented Shaun Kennedy in a matrimonial case, sent an email to opposing counsel about a routine scheduling matter on Sept. 12, 2017. But “negligently and without care,” Brueche's message included a password and related information allowing any recipient to access electronic files that were stored by her firm, the Weinberger Divorce and Family Law Group of Parsippany, New Jersey. The exposed information related to the representation of Kennedy.
The email included a disclaimer that any information or materials not meant for the recipient should be destroyed or returned. But Brueche's opposing counsel, Gregory D.R. Behringer of Laufer, Dalena, Cadicina, Jensen & Bradley in Morristown, New Jersey, allegedly provided the email to his client, who was Kennedy's wife and adverse party. She accessed the link more than 500 times, disseminated the file's contents to others and used its contents in the matrimonial proceeding, the suit claims.
Shaun Kennedy's suit, filed April 24, brings claims of legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against the Weinberger Divorce and Family Law Group and attorney Brueche.
The improper disclosures aided Behringer and his client in forming a strategy in the case, said S.M. Chris Franzblau of Franzblau Dratch in Livingston, New Jersey, who is representing Kennedy in the malpractice action.
Brueche learned that her email allowed access to her firm's file about six weeks after sending it, but she and the firm failed to promptly advise Kennedy of the breach of his privileged information, the suit claims. In addition, Brueche, while representing Kennedy, failed to seek any relief from the court that would have mitigated the effects of the mishap, such as a protective order that would require Behringer and his client return the materials obtained by the September email, the suit claims.
Kennedy's suit asserts he had an attorney-client relationship with Brueche, as evidenced by their binding, written retainer agreement by which she and her firm obtained fees in excess of $160,000 in the divorce case, according to the suit.
Kennedy's file was subject to attorney-client privilege and was “of a highly confidential and personal nature,” the suit says. The email stated that any person reading it who is not an intended recipient should notify the sender by telephone or email and delete all copies of the email.
Kennedy's wife “made use of the information she illegally accessed in an attempt to embarrass and humiliate Shaun and prevent his rights of communication and visitation with his children and compromise his confidential attorney right to fair representation and disseminated the wrongfully obtained information,” the suit says.
Kennedy and his wife, who were married in 2008, obtained a judgment of divorce in December 2017.
The insertion of password information in Brueche's email to Behringer was caused by improperly installed software, said Aaron Weinberger, executive director of the Weinberger Divorce and Family Law Group. “The breach was a result of the software company that we hired. The software was set up incorrectly,” he said.
No other messages providing access to the firm's files were sent out, and no other files were viewed by nonauthorized parties, Weinberger said. The firm conducted a lengthy investigation after learning about the email, Weinberger said.
Weinberger also disputed the suit's assertion about the effect of the files' disclosure on Kennedy, saying there was “nothing disclosed that impacted his case at all.”
The suit also brought claims for invasion of privacy, intrusion on seclusion, invasion of publicity, intentional infliction of emotional distress, malicious use of process and causing false arrest against Kennedy's wife, Carey. The suit also accused Carey Kennedy of making unauthorized access to a computer network, in violation of N.J.S.A. 2A:38A-1, which imposes civil liability for unauthorized access to any computer or computer system. Carey Kennedy could not be reached for comment.
Behringer declined to comment on the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs AI-Generated Fraud Rises, Financial Companies Face a Long Cybersecurity Battle
Trending Stories
- 1No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 2Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 3Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 4Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
- 5Freshfields Hires Ex-SEC Corporate Finance Director in Silicon Valley
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250