Doctor Board Can Be Sued Separately From Hospital, NJ Federal Judge Rules
"Although this court has misgivings about the analytical rigor of treating a group of people on a committee as a singular committee for purposes of legal capacity, the clear trend under New Jersey law is to regard such groups as unincorporated associations," U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler said.
May 01, 2018 at 06:22 PM
3 minute read
U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler/Photo by Carmen Natale
A hospital's medical executive committee—the group of high-ranking doctors in a hospital that generally decide who gets privileges and who doesn't—can be sued as an entity separate from the hospital, a federal judge has ruled, pointing to a “clear trend” in New Jersey law.
U.S. District Judge Robert Kugler of the District of New Jersey, sitting in Camden, said a medical executive committee is a legal entity that can be subject to a lawsuit.
“We find that the medical executive committee has the capacity to sue or be sued,” Kugler said in Nahas v. Shore Medical Center in a ruling dated April 27.
The dispute involves an endovascular surgeon, Frederick Nahas, who has been seeking to have his privileges reinstated at Shore Medical Center in Somers Point after pleading guilty to a crime, according to the court.
Nahas received his license to practice medicine in 1978 and was granted vascular surgical privileges at Shore Medical Center. In 2002, he pleaded guilty in federal court to a charge of preventing, obstructing, misleading and delaying the communication of information and records relating to a health care investigation, according to court documents.
Nahas was sentenced to one month in prison, three months of home confinement, 100 hours of community service, and three years of probation, and was fined $20,000; in 2003, Shore Medical Center suspended all of his privileges for three years. In 2005, the state Board of Medical Examiners suspended his license for nine months, according to the documents.
His license to practice was restored in 2006. Since then, Nahas has been attempting to have his full privileges restored at Shore Medical Center. The hospital's medical executive committee (MEC), which comprises department chairs, at-large members and other physicians, have granted him some privileges, but not all of the ones he had before his guilty plea, Kugler noted.
Nahas sued the hospital and the MEC, but the MEC argued that it could not be the subject of a lawsuit since it was not an entity subject to litigation.
Kugler disagreed.
An MEC, Kugler said, is a “decision-making entity,” and can be sued.
“When an association is sufficiently distinct and its membership is distinguishable from the entity, it can be found to be an unincorporated association with the capacity to be sued,” Kugler said.
“Although this court has misgivings about the analytical rigor of treating a group of people on a committee as a singular committee for purposes of legal capacity, the clear trend under New Jersey law is to regard such groups as unincorporated associations,” Kugler said.
Neither Nahas' attorney, Perth Amboy solo Jacqueline Bittner, nor the hospital's attorney, Edward Fanning Jr. of Newark's McCarter & English, returned calls seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250