Town Defiant After NJ AG Opposes 'Residents-Only' Traffic Ordinance
A lawyer who sued Leonia over its restrictions on nonresident motorists filed an order to show cause on Friday, asking the town to stop enforcing its law in light of an opinion from the Attorney General's Office declaring Town Ordinance 2018-5 invalid.
May 04, 2018 at 04:07 PM
4 minute read
Gurbir S. Grewal, New Jersey attorney general, speaks at Seton Hall University School of Law in February 2018
New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal's office has spoken out against locals-only driving restrictions enacted in the towns of Leonia and Weehawken, but that might not be enough to stop the controversial traffic-taming practice.
A lawyer who sued Leonia over its restrictions on nonresident motorists filed an order to show cause on May 4, asking the town to stop enforcing its law in light of an opinion from the Attorney General's Office declaring Town Ordinance 2018-5 invalid. But the town's mayor has said in published accounts that Leonia did not agree with the state's contention that the restrictions it imposed lie outside the authority of a municipality.
In January, Leonia posted red signs warning nonresidents to stay off of roughly 60 secondary streets in the town, lest they face a $200 fine. The restrictions are only in effect at certain hours of the day. Residents of the town were issued yellow hanging tags for their cars, so police can differentiate between locals and outsiders. The law was enacted to cut down on traffic, especially from drivers seeking shortcuts to the George Washington Bridge who are directed onto secondary streets by navigation applications such as Waze. Fort Lee attorney Jacqueline Rosa, who is self-represented, filed a suit Jan. 30 to have the Leonia ordinance deemed invalid.
Weehawken enacted a similar ordinance that went into effect Feb. 13.
Rosa said she wrote to Grewal after discovering a 1955 formal opinion from the Attorney General's Office invalidating an ordinance enacted by Demarest which barred designation of “no through” streets, prohibiting traffic whose destination is not on the street in question. She asked Grewal if that opinion still stands, and the state concluded that it does.
Letters sent on March 16 by Kevin Jespersen, chief counsel to the attorney general, to Leonia and Weehawken town officials say the ordinances are invalid because they were not reviewed by the state Department of Transportation. The letters also cite the 1955 opinion by then-Attorney General Grover Richman Jr. in the Demarest case.
“There is no inherent power vested in a municipality by which it may legally restrict the right of the public to the free use of streets and roads. Any right of the municipality to pass ordinances and resolutions regarding the flow of traffic over its streets and highways can arise only by legislative grant; and there has been none,” Richman said in a letter to Frederick Gassert Jr., who was then director of the Division of Motor Vehicles.
Both letters instructed local officials to refrain from enforcing the ordinances “or the Attorney General will be required to take appropriate action to enforce the law.”
Jespersen encouraged Leonia and Weehawken officials to work “with the New Jersey Department of Transportation to discuss a lawful resolution” of their traffic problems. In each case, the Attorney General's Office said it was willing to “facilitate and participate” in the meetings.
Leonia officials did not respond to calls from the Law Journal. Mayor Judah Ziegler said on northjersey.com that the town would not withdraw its ordinance and that the attorney general was not concerned about pedestrian safety in the town. Ziegler told the website that the town did not share the attorney general's belief that Leonia lacked authority to take the actions it did.
Rosa said she was “pleased” that the Attorney General's Office stepped into the controversy, and that she was “shocked to say the least” that the mayor is not accepting the attorney general's interpretation of the law.
Rosa says she has spoken to many people who have been questioned by police in Leonia while on the way to patronize local businesses, to make doctor appointments or to visit friends. She says she passes through Leonia on her daily commute, but has not received a ticket in Leonia. She is not concerned about lack of standing, since standing rules for a prerogative writ action are very flexible, requiring only a loose public interest, a standard she says she can meet.
Weehawken's municipal attorney, Richard Venino, said the town had not enforced its ordinance, which only applies to handful of locations. He said town officials met in early April with representatives from the Attorney General's office and the state Department of Transportation to discuss possible solutions to the traffic problems.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Point Us to the Plain Language': NJ Supreme Court Grills Defense Statutory Requirements for Affidavit of Merit
5 minute readAttorney of the Year Finalist: Matheu Nunn's Supreme Court Successes
Appellate Division Rulings Remind Us That, Despite Arbitration's Informal Nature, There Are Rules
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250