$625,000 Accord Ends Suit Over Ex-Prosecutor's Order for Psych Test of Employee
A $625,000 settlement has been reached in a suit that claimed former Bergen County Prosecutor John Molinelli sent an employee of his office for involuntary commitment to a psychiatric facility as a favor to the worker's romantic rival.
May 08, 2018 at 04:47 PM
4 minute read
A $625,000 settlement has been reached in a suit that claimed former Bergen County Prosecutor John Molinelli sent an employee of his office for involuntary commitment to a psychiatric facility as a favor to the worker's romantic rival.
Molinelli sought a 72-hour evaluation for Barbara Harrington, a data processing employee of the prosecutor's office and 30-year veteran, in 2012, the suit claims. Harrington was taken by department employees to Bergen Regional Medical Center after a longtime friend of Molinelli, Patricia Speake-Martin, asked the prosecutor to fire her, the suit claimed.
But doctors discharged Harrington after three hours, finding she posed no danger to herself or others, the suit claimed. A month later, the prosecutor's office ordered Harrington to undergo a fitness-for-duty evaluation with a New York psychologist, Azariah Eshkenazi. But that doctor likewise found she posed no danger to herself or others, the suit claimed.
Speake-Martin, a neighbor of Molinelli in Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey, and his former law firm colleague, resented Harrington because she was living with Speake-Martin's estranged husband, David Martin, the suit claimed. Molinelli sought the evaluation of Harrington after she said in a text message to Martin's three children that he had been in an accident, although there was no accident. Harrington sent the erroneous message because of a malfunction of the voice recognition feature on the mobile phone she was using, and she promptly straightened out the confusion, the suit claimed. But Speake-Martin called Molinelli to complain about Harrington's actions on the night the message was sent.
“We believe this was at her bidding,” said Anthony Rainone of Brach Eichler in Roseland, New jersey, who represented Harrington. “What was undisputed was that Patricia picked up the phone and called John that evening. John only acted because she called,” said Rainone.
Molinelli and Speake-Martin both worked at the firm of Maycher & Molinelli from 1985 to 1991. Later, from 1996 to 2002, Molinelli worked as the borough attorney for Woodcliff Lake, a period when Speake-Martin did stints as municipal prosecutor and public defender. Molinelli served as Bergen County prosecutor from 2002 to 2016. He did not respond to a request for comment about the case.
Harrington was on paid suspension from her job until December 2012 and was on unpaid suspension until May 1, 2013, when she resigned. Her suit, filed in September 2014, brought claims under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, and claimed violations of her rights under the New Jersey Civil Rights Act.
The settlement, executed Monday, came after a conference with U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler. Bergen County reached the settlement on behalf of the county prosecutor's office, Molinelli and several other county employees. Speake-Martin was not party to the settlement but the suit against her was dropped.
”Ms. Harrington's social and professional world for nearly 30 years was her employment at the Bergen County Prosecutor's Office, where, by all accounts, she was liked and respected,” Rainone said. “The plaintiff alleged that Molinelli's unconstitutional actions deprived her of most people's basic desire—a place to go to work to every day.”
Bergen County Counsel Julien Neals confirmed the settlement, adding that the county made no admission of liability. The settlement was reached in consultation with the prosecutor's office, which felt comfortable with the terms, Neals said.
Speake-Martin's lawyer in the case, Fred Pisani of Ramp & Pisani in Tenafly, New Jersey, said the claims against his client in the case were “baseless,” and that she did not contribute toward the settlement. He added that Speake-Martin “vehemently denied and vigorously defended the claims from the beginning” and that she was “saddened that her family had to go through this.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readUnion Leader Awarded $662K Judgment Against Employer in Decade-Old Wiretap Suit
5 minute readVirtua Drug Tests Pregnancy Patients Without Consent, NJ Attorney General Alleges in New Suit
3 minute read'Bewitched by the Technology': $300K to Settle Faulty Facial Recognition
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250