Judiciary Charts Steps Taken to Rectify Crime Lab Irregularities
Alleged misconduct by a New Jersey crime lab technician has prompted charges against 1,160 criminal defendants to be marked for dismissal because purported drug evidence in those cases was destroyed, according to a judge supervising cases impacted by the lab's problems.
May 11, 2018 at 03:31 PM
4 minute read
Photo: Mitch M/Shutterstock.com
Alleged misconduct by a New Jersey crime lab technician has prompted charges against 1,160 criminal defendants to be marked for dismissal because purported drug evidence in those cases was destroyed, according to a judge supervising cases impacted by the lab's problems.
Meanwhile, evidence has been re-tested in cases involving another 1,326 defendants that were brought based on testing of alleged drugs carried out by the same technician, and each has confirmed the prior positive test results for controlled dangerous substances, Superior Court Judge Edward Jerejian said in a case management order issued on Wednesday.
Jerejian, who was assigned in 2016 to supervise cases potentially compromised by improper testing procedures by State Police technician Kamalkant Shah, also announced his plan for evaluating such cases.
Under Jerejian's plan, the first phase addresses defendants for whom the Office of the Public Defender has already filed motions to have drug convictions vacated and cases dismissed.
The first phase of the case management program concerns cases in which a motion for relief has been filed. Since potential irregularities in the state police crime lab came to light in late 2015, 485 motions for post-conviction relief have been filed. Of those, 401 have been resolved, the judiciary said in an statement.
Of the 401 cases, 397 were resolved when the Public Defender's Office withdrew the motions, based on re-testing of suspected drug evidence that re-tested positive, and the other four were dismissed by Jerejian, according to the state Attorney General's office.
For remaining motions where evidence is available, Jerejian's order said, the Attorney General's Office will have 180 days to re-test the evidence using gas chromatography mass spectrometry testing.
The second part of the plan concerns cases where a motion for relief has been filed but drug evidence has been destroyed. In those cases, the attorney general will determine whether the underlying charges or adjudication should be vacated. Where charges are recommended for dismissal, the attorney general will file a proposed order, and the defendant will be provided a copy of the dismissal order and notice of eligibility for expungement, for which filing fees are to be waived, Jerejian's order said.
The third phase of the plan concerns cases where no motion for relief has been filed but evidence is available. There, the Attorney General's Office agrees to re-test the evidence, Jerejian said. To date, 883 such cases have been retested and in each case the retest confirmed the original positive test for drugs, Jerejian said.
Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, in a statement, said he was proud of the manner in which his office collaborated with the judiciary and Office of the Public Defender to respond to the allegations of irregularities at the state crime lab.
“The important steps set forth in Judge Jerejian's order ensure that justice is served in all cases. We remain committed to ensuring that no conviction is upheld unless we are satisfied that any drug testing conducted was in fact reliable,” Grewal's statement said.
First Assistant Public Defender Kevin Walker, in a statement, praised the advanced testing procedures and equipment now used by State Police in its crime lab.
“One of the principal benefits of this litigation has been the state's adoption of a new protocol for the testing of suspected marijuana. Hopefully with its adoption, we will avoid future allegations of laboratory fraud. We commend the Office of Attorney General for heeding the calls for reform, in the face of these allegations, and for so readily changing the testing protocol to comport with best practices,” Walker said in a statement.
The appointment of Jerejian as special master and the re-examination of thousands of old cases were prompted by allegations that Shah failed to properly conduct laboratory analyses of purported drug evidence. Shah, who was a 10-year veteran of the state police lab in Little Falls, New Jersey, was suspended for allegedly recording test results on a specimen of purported marijuana without properly conducting the analysis. Shah has not been been charged criminally and has retired.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250