Judiciary Charts Steps Taken to Rectify Crime Lab Irregularities
Alleged misconduct by a New Jersey crime lab technician has prompted charges against 1,160 criminal defendants to be marked for dismissal because purported drug evidence in those cases was destroyed, according to a judge supervising cases impacted by the lab's problems.
May 11, 2018 at 03:31 PM
4 minute read
Alleged misconduct by a New Jersey crime lab technician has prompted charges against 1,160 criminal defendants to be marked for dismissal because purported drug evidence in those cases was destroyed, according to a judge supervising cases impacted by the lab's problems.
Meanwhile, evidence has been re-tested in cases involving another 1,326 defendants that were brought based on testing of alleged drugs carried out by the same technician, and each has confirmed the prior positive test results for controlled dangerous substances, Superior Court Judge Edward Jerejian said in a case management order issued on Wednesday.
Jerejian, who was assigned in 2016 to supervise cases potentially compromised by improper testing procedures by State Police technician Kamalkant Shah, also announced his plan for evaluating such cases.
Under Jerejian's plan, the first phase addresses defendants for whom the Office of the Public Defender has already filed motions to have drug convictions vacated and cases dismissed.
The first phase of the case management program concerns cases in which a motion for relief has been filed. Since potential irregularities in the state police crime lab came to light in late 2015, 485 motions for post-conviction relief have been filed. Of those, 401 have been resolved, the judiciary said in an statement.
Of the 401 cases, 397 were resolved when the Public Defender's Office withdrew the motions, based on re-testing of suspected drug evidence that re-tested positive, and the other four were dismissed by Jerejian, according to the state Attorney General's office.
For remaining motions where evidence is available, Jerejian's order said, the Attorney General's Office will have 180 days to re-test the evidence using gas chromatography mass spectrometry testing.
The second part of the plan concerns cases where a motion for relief has been filed but drug evidence has been destroyed. In those cases, the attorney general will determine whether the underlying charges or adjudication should be vacated. Where charges are recommended for dismissal, the attorney general will file a proposed order, and the defendant will be provided a copy of the dismissal order and notice of eligibility for expungement, for which filing fees are to be waived, Jerejian's order said.
The third phase of the plan concerns cases where no motion for relief has been filed but evidence is available. There, the Attorney General's Office agrees to re-test the evidence, Jerejian said. To date, 883 such cases have been retested and in each case the retest confirmed the original positive test for drugs, Jerejian said.
Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, in a statement, said he was proud of the manner in which his office collaborated with the judiciary and Office of the Public Defender to respond to the allegations of irregularities at the state crime lab.
“The important steps set forth in Judge Jerejian's order ensure that justice is served in all cases. We remain committed to ensuring that no conviction is upheld unless we are satisfied that any drug testing conducted was in fact reliable,” Grewal's statement said.
First Assistant Public Defender Kevin Walker, in a statement, praised the advanced testing procedures and equipment now used by State Police in its crime lab.
“One of the principal benefits of this litigation has been the state's adoption of a new protocol for the testing of suspected marijuana. Hopefully with its adoption, we will avoid future allegations of laboratory fraud. We commend the Office of Attorney General for heeding the calls for reform, in the face of these allegations, and for so readily changing the testing protocol to comport with best practices,” Walker said in a statement.
The appointment of Jerejian as special master and the re-examination of thousands of old cases were prompted by allegations that Shah failed to properly conduct laboratory analyses of purported drug evidence. Shah, who was a 10-year veteran of the state police lab in Little Falls, New Jersey, was suspended for allegedly recording test results on a specimen of purported marijuana without properly conducting the analysis. Shah has not been been charged criminally and has retired.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
4 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
3 minute readAstraZeneca Files Flurry of Lawsuits to Protect Cancer Treatment Drug
3 minute readIn 2-1 Ruling, Court Clears Way for Decade-Old Wrongful Imprisonment Suit
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250