NJ Senate Judiciary Committee OKs 3 Bergen Judges for Tenure
The nominations of the three judges—Keith Bachmann, Terry Bottinelli and Christine Farrington—must still be approved by the full Senate. None of the nominees faced any opposition in the committee hearing.
May 14, 2018 at 02:51 PM
4 minute read
The New Jersey Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday recommended tenure for three Superior Court judges sitting in Bergen County.
The nominations of the three judges—Keith Bachmann, Terry Bottinelli and Christine Farrington—must still be approved by the full Senate. None of the nominees faced any opposition in the committee hearing.
Bachmann and Farrington currently are assigned to the Civil Part, while Bottinelli sits in the Family Part.
In the Law Journal's most recent Superior Court Judicial Survey, from 2015, Bachmann ranked 13th out of the 24 judges in the vicinage, with an overall rating of 8.34 out of a possible 10. His best score, 9.47, was for being unbiased toward race, gender or party identity. His lowest score, 7.42, was for his ability to handle complex cases.
Before his 2011 confirmation, Bachmann had been with Hetchka, Bachmann & Figundio in Clifton since 1983 and had been the municipal judge and attorney for New Milford, the attorney for the Palisades Park Rent Adjustment Board and Recreation Committee, and Palisades Park's public defender. He is a graduate of New York Law School and Kean College.
In one case of note from 2016, Bachmann ruled that a woman from Saudi Arabia couldn't sue her half-sister from New Jersey for defaming her on an Instagram account because it would have required him to interpret Islamic law.
Bottinelli ranked 14th in the survey from the Bergen vicinage, with an overall score of 8.31. Bottinelli's best score, 8.95, was for being courteous and respectful to litigants and lawyers. His lowest score, 7.97, was for the ability to handle to complex cases.
Bottinelli was with Herten Burstein Sheridan Cevasco Bottinelli Litt & Harz in Hackensack from 1990 until his 2011 confirmation. Before that, from 1981 to 1990, he was with Hackensack's Breslin & Breslin. He had been the judge for Closter; the attorney for Mahwah; the prosecutor for North Arlington, Bergenfield and Fairview; the public defender for Cresskill; and the planning and zoning board attorney for Bogota, Closter and Dumont. He is a graduate of the New England School of Law and Fairfield University.
Bottinelli made news in 2016 for his ruling turning back a constitutional challenge to New Jersey's so-called palimony law.
Farrington, at the time of the 2015 survey, was assigned to the Civil Part in Essex County. She ranked 29th out of the 38 judges from that vicinage, with an overall score of 7.60. Her best score, 8.45, was for being unbiased toward race, gender or party identity, while her lowest score, 7.06, was for being able to handle complex cases.
Before joining the bench, Farrington had been deputy general counsel for the Port Authority of New York-New Jersey since 2002. She was a Hackensack solo from 1997 until 2002; with Biagiotti, Marino, Montecallo & Farrington in Hackensack from 1992 to 1996; and with Breslin & Breslin in Hackensack from 1984 to 1990.
She was an assistant Bergen County prosecutor from 1979 to 1984. She was prosecutor, planning board attorney and public defender for South Hackensack; planning board attorney for Alpine and Saddle Brook; public defender for Rochelle Park; and board of adjustment attorney for Wyckoff. Farrington is a graduate of Rutgers Law School-Newark and Seton Hall University.
Farrington made news for sanctioning Panasonic $94,000 for its handling of privileged materials in a discrimination suit by former company employees, leading to Panasonic's ultimately unsuccessful bid to disqualify her from the case.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1Stock Trading App Robinhood Hit With Privacy Class Action 1 Month After Alleged Data Breach
- 2NY High Court Returns Fired Priest's Discrimination Claim to State Agency
- 3Digging Deep to Mitigate Risk in Lithium Mine Venture Wins GM Legal Department of the Year Award
- 4Reminder: Court Rules and Statutes Apply to Pendente Lite Custody Decisions
- 5Consumer Cleared to Proceed With Claims Against CVS 'Non-Drowsy' Medication, Judge Says
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250