Patent Office Rejects NJ's Challenge to Pizzeria Logo Likened to Parkway Signs
Tuesday's ruling by the USPTO's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board denied the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's application to halt trademark registration of a logo by Jersey Boardwalk Pizza Co.
May 16, 2018 at 05:54 PM
5 minute read
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has ruled that a Florida pizzeria may register and use a logo that closely resembles the green and yellow signs of the Garden State Parkway.
Tuesday's ruling by the USPTO's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board denied the New Jersey Turnpike Authority's application to halt trademark registration of a logo by Jersey Boardwalk Pizza Co. The pizzeria's signage is similar to that of the Garden State Parkway, but confusion between them is unlikely because the goods and services offered by each are dissimilar, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled.
The board, in New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Jersey Boardwalk Franchising, rejected the highway authority's claim that its logo was associated with restaurant services because the Turnpike Authority leases space to food vendors, including McDonald's, Starbucks and Pizza Hut, at its rest areas. Administrative trademark judges Thomas Wellington, Angela Lykos and Cynthia Lynch noted that the Turnpike Authority is essentially a landlord to those food vendors, rejecting the authority's assertion that those companies are licensees of the Garden State Parkway trademark.
“We cannot conclude that plaintiff has proven common law rights in its mark for restaurant services. We lack proof that consumers of these restaurants would have encountered plaintiff's mark in connection with these services,” the panel said.
The judges also rejected the Turnpike Authority's claim that the pizzeria acted in bad faith because it proceeded with its plans even after receiving a cease-and-desist letter from the Turnpike Authority, which operates the Garden State Parkway.
“We infer no bad faith from defendants' creation of a New Jersey-themed motif for its restaurants, or from submission of the application even after plaintiff's cease-and-desist letter, because as Defendants expressed in their response to the letter, and as we find here, the applied-for mark is not likely to cause consumer confusion,” the judges said.
The board did find in favor of the Turnpike Authority on some other issues in the case. It granted the authority's request to cancel an earlier version of the pizzeria's trademark, which is no longer in use. It also denied the pizzeria's counterclaim seeking to cancel the Turnpike Authority's registration of its own logo.
“The Turnpike Authority took a position that nobody could have a mark that was similar to theirs. The decision is novel because, if you read the opinion, the New Jersey Turnpike Authority has been sending cease-and-desist letters to companies around New Jersey, forcing them to stop using a logo similar to the Garden State Parkway logo. This is the first company that stood up to them and ultimately got a determination in their favor,” said Justin Klein of Marks & Klein in Red Bank, New Jersey, who represented the pizzeria along with the firm's JoyAnn Kenny.
“It's been four long years, there have been a lot of resources spent on this, on both sides. [The pizzeria owners] are relieved that it's over. They just want to sell pizza,” Klein said.
Klein added that the outcome of the case would not prevent the Turnpike Authority from licensing its intellectual property, including the Garden State Parkway logo, and collect royalties for its use on items such as T-shirts and mugs.
The Turnpike Authority's lawyer was Ronald Israel of Chiesa, Shahinian & Giantomasi in West Orange, New Jersey. He did not respond to calls about the ruling.
A spokesman for the New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Thomas Feeney, said in a statement, “We are pleased that the board upheld the validity of our trademark, and we're pleased that they canceled Boardwalk Pizza's existing logo registration. We are disappointed and obviously disagree with the board's decision regarding Boardwalk Pizza's pending logo application, and we are exploring our appeal options.”
Tuesday's decision is subject to appeal at the U.S. District Court or to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Jersey Boardwalk Pizza, operated by former New Jersey residents, has three locations in Florida—Tavernier, Homestead and Key Largo, and will soon open a fourth, in Kendall. Playing up its connections to New Jersey, the company seeks franchisees for additional locations.
The Turnpike Authority sued the pizzeria over the look-alike logos in July 2014. U.S. District Judge William Martini dismissed that case in March 2015, finding the Florida eateries lack sufficient contacts with New Jersey to make it subject to personal jurisdiction in the state. The Turnpike Authority filed its case with the USPTO in October 2014.
The pizzeria dispute is not the only one over businesses adopting logos similar to that of the Garden State Parkway. In 2016, the New Jersey Turnpike authority was sued by a Hunterdon County, New Jersey, winery that sells a line of wines under the label “What Exit.” The winery, in DW Vineyards v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority, sought declaratory relief for it to continue selling its “What Exit” wines with a logo resembling that of the green-and-yellow Garden State Parkway signs.
The winery case is set for a settlement conference on June 19 before U.S. Magistrate Judge Tonianne Bongiovanni.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readShe May Take the Bench: Appellate Division Sides With Prosecutor in Pension Dispute
4 minute readIndemnification of Board Member-Plaintiffs Must Be Expressly Stated, NJ Supreme Court Says
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies
- 2Morgan Lewis Shutters Shenzhen Office Less Than Two Years After Launch
- 3Litigating the Written Word: Parol Evidence Rule and the Gist of the Action Doctrine in Fraud Claims
- 4Why Wait? Arbitrate! The Value of Consenting to Arbitrate Your SUM Cases at NAM
- 5The Legal Status of Presidential Diaries Must Be Clarified
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250