NJ, Citing Threat to Tax Base, Seeks Intervenor Status in DACA Action
New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said Monday he has moved to intervene in a lawsuit filed in federal court by the state of Texas seeking an end to the "Dreamers" immigration program.
May 21, 2018 at 05:45 PM
3 minute read
Gurbir S. Grewal, New Jersey attorney general, speaks at Seton Hall Law School. Photo by Carmen Natale.
New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal said Monday he has moved to intervene in a lawsuit filed in federal court by the state of Texas seeking an end to the “Dreamers” immigration program.
In most cases, Dreamers were brought to the United States illegally by their parents, but are allowed to remain based on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, more commonly referred to as DACA.
Grewal, in a court document filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, is asking for the state to be allowed to intervene as a defendant in the Texas action, which was joined by six other states. Texas has opposed New Jersey's effort to intervene, according to the document.
“Dreamers are as American as those of us who were born here, and we'll do everything we can to protect them,” Grewal said in a statement Monday.
“Unfortunately, the state of Texas has brought a lawsuit to force the federal government to end protections for Dreamers, an action that would put 17,000 New Jersey residents at risk of deportation,” Grewal said, citing what he called the need to “step up” to defend Dreamers if the U.S. Justice Department will not do so.
The Trump administration announced its intention to end DACA in 2017, but has been enjoined by several courts from doing so. Recently, Texas and six other states filed a lawsuit in federal court in the Southern District of Texas arguing that DACA is illegal, because it was formed without congressional action. The suit seeks an injunction halting the issuance or renewal of future DACA permits, and seeks an order directing the federal government to implement its plan to end DACA.
In Monday's filing, Grewal asserts that New Jersey should be granted intervenor status because a “termination of DACA will directly harm New Jersey and its residents, whose health and well-being the State has a duty to protect.”
Among those filing declarations with the court in support of New Jersey's motion were Rutgers University President Robert L. Barchi and several Dreamers who live and work in New Jersey.
New Jersey contends that it has an interest in the litigation because the state government employs DACA residents, and the state treasury derives tax revenue from those workers and residents.
According to Grewal, there are 53,000 New Jersey residents eligible for DACA, and 17,400 in the program already, Grewal said. Of those, 15,900 are employed, with upward of 900 owning businesses, and about 7,800 in some level of school. The brief claims New Jersey stands to lose $19 million in annual tax revenue if DACA ended.
The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen, sitting in Brownsville.
Earlier this year, Gov. Phil Murphy announced that New Jersey would join as a plaintiff a lawsuit filed by New York State against the Trump administration over the move to discontinue DACA.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250