BAR REPORT - Answering 'Why Does Oral Argument Matter?'
Oral argument can be absolutely critical, according to a panel of expert jurists who spoke at the NJSBA annual meeting.
May 28, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Oral argument may not be the tipping point in every case, but it can be absolutely critical, according to a panel of expert jurists who spoke at the New Jersey State Bar Association's Annual Meeting and Convention in Atlantic City earlier this month.
“Can minds be changed? Definitely. Argument has changed my mind in the past,” said U.S. Third Circuit Court Judge Michael Chagares at the seminar “Effective Oral Argument in the Appellate and Trial Courts.”
New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Barry T. Albin said that the justices of the state's highest court read the briefs in a case, review bench memos and research prior to oral arguments, but they do not conference before them.
“Our positions may not yet have crystalized, so this is a perfect opportunity for advocates to launch their argument to members of the Court who may not have fixed opinions … I have left oral argument looking at a particular issue in a very, very different way. I have done, at times, a complete 180 … you really have the opportunity to change minds,” Albin said.
When it comes to the Appellate Division level, Judge Jack Sabatino said there are two reasons why oral argument can be really important.
“One is that how the argument goes may not necessarily affect the bottom-line result, but it may affect how narrowly or broadly we write the opinion,” he said. “The other reasons is … lawyers can be a wonderful sounding board for us on an approach that might not be exactly what either party advocated.”
Assignment Judge Mary C. Jacobson, who sits in Mercer County, also gave the viewpoints of a trial court jurist, which can present a different dynamic since there is only one judge.
Here are nine of their top tips for success on your feet:
- Get to your point;
- Breathe to conquer nerves and make sure to eat something;
- Know your case and be prepared to point to the record to back up positions;
- Watch the little things—if you're a person who talks with your hands, don't keep a cup of water on the podium;
- Respect the court and adversaries, especially when disputing a point;
- Make eye contact;
- It's ok to ask for clarification about a question a jurist is asking, but don't be antagonistic;
- Respond and calibrate—only address the most successful and relevant issues from your brief; and
- Think of yourself as striking up a conversation with the court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250