BAR REPORT - Answering 'Why Does Oral Argument Matter?'
Oral argument can be absolutely critical, according to a panel of expert jurists who spoke at the NJSBA annual meeting.
May 28, 2018 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Oral argument may not be the tipping point in every case, but it can be absolutely critical, according to a panel of expert jurists who spoke at the New Jersey State Bar Association's Annual Meeting and Convention in Atlantic City earlier this month.
“Can minds be changed? Definitely. Argument has changed my mind in the past,” said U.S. Third Circuit Court Judge Michael Chagares at the seminar “Effective Oral Argument in the Appellate and Trial Courts.”
New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Barry T. Albin said that the justices of the state's highest court read the briefs in a case, review bench memos and research prior to oral arguments, but they do not conference before them.
“Our positions may not yet have crystalized, so this is a perfect opportunity for advocates to launch their argument to members of the Court who may not have fixed opinions … I have left oral argument looking at a particular issue in a very, very different way. I have done, at times, a complete 180 … you really have the opportunity to change minds,” Albin said.
When it comes to the Appellate Division level, Judge Jack Sabatino said there are two reasons why oral argument can be really important.
“One is that how the argument goes may not necessarily affect the bottom-line result, but it may affect how narrowly or broadly we write the opinion,” he said. “The other reasons is … lawyers can be a wonderful sounding board for us on an approach that might not be exactly what either party advocated.”
Assignment Judge Mary C. Jacobson, who sits in Mercer County, also gave the viewpoints of a trial court jurist, which can present a different dynamic since there is only one judge.
Here are nine of their top tips for success on your feet:
- Get to your point;
- Breathe to conquer nerves and make sure to eat something;
- Know your case and be prepared to point to the record to back up positions;
- Watch the little things—if you're a person who talks with your hands, don't keep a cup of water on the podium;
- Respect the court and adversaries, especially when disputing a point;
- Make eye contact;
- It's ok to ask for clarification about a question a jurist is asking, but don't be antagonistic;
- Respond and calibrate—only address the most successful and relevant issues from your brief; and
- Think of yourself as striking up a conversation with the court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Issues to Watch in the US Appeals Courts in 2025
- 2Ex-MoviePass CEO Submits to Ban, Settling SEC Allegations
- 3Baker McKenzie, Jones Day, Reed Smith Make 2025 Partner Promotions
- 4Key Securities Issues Need a Look From SCOTUS, Lawyers Say
- 5In-House Moves of the Month: Boeing Loses Another Lawyer, HubSpot Legal Chief Out After 2 Years
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250