Pharma Sales Rep Pleads Guilty to Opioid Bribery Charges
The guilty plea comes as the state continues to pursue litigation against Insys Therapeutics Inc., the Arizona-based pharmaceutical company that has become the central target of the state's efforts to combat opioid abuse.
May 31, 2018 at 10:03 AM
3 minute read
A sales representative for Insys Therapeutics Inc., the opioid maker that has been the subject of mounting litigation of late, pleaded guilty in New Jersey on Wednesday to her part in an alleged scheme in which doctors were bribed to increase off-label prescriptions of painkiller Subsys.
The guilty plea comes as the state continues to pursue litigation against the Arizona-based pharmaceutical company, which has become the central target of the state's efforts to combat opioid abuse.
Michelle Breitenbach, 38, of Middletown, a New Jersey-based sales rep for the company, pleaded guilty before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Benjamin Bucca Jr. to a second-degree charge of conspiracy to commit commercial bribery, according to the Attorney General's Office.
A release said Breitenbach admitted that she participated in a scheme in which doctors, in return for off-label prescribing of Subsys, were paid kickbacks and bribes in the form of purported speaker fees for marketing and education events.
Breitenbach, the release said, faces a possible prison sentence of up to five years.
According to the release, doctors participated in the speaking engagements supposedly to inform other doctors about Subsys, but speakers were paid regardless of whether they spoke or if no one attended. Breitenbach claimed she was pressured from above at Insys to push the speaking programs, the office said.
Breitenbach's lawyer, Nicholas Harbist at the Princeton office of Blank Rome, didn't return a call for comment.
The state has alleged in a lawsuit that the founder of Insys, John Kapoor, and his company engaged in an illegal campaign to push sales of Subsys, a potent pain medication typically reserved for cancer patients. They are accused in the civil complaint of endangering the public through efforts to push drug sales illegally. The state alleges that two New Jersey state employee health benefit plans paid a total of approximately $10.3 million to reimburse Subsys prescriptions between 2012 and the third quarter of 2016, while the state workers' compensation program paid another $300,000. The lawsuit claims violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the New Jersey False Claims Act. The suit asks that Insys and Kapoor be assessed civil penalties, treble damages, and fees and costs.
The state's complaint alleges that Insys's corporate decision-makers, led by Kapoor, devised a strategy to expand what they recognized as a limited market for Subsys by aggressively pushing off-label uses of the drug, even to podiatrists and other specialty practitioners who typically would have little call to treat cancer patients or prescribe powerful Schedule II painkillers.
From the 2012 market launch of Subsys until the present, the drug has accounted for approximately 98 percent of net revenues for Insys, a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Chandler, Arizona, according to the suit. Insys, which has raised the price of Subsys every year since its launch, sold $74.2 million worth of the drug in New Jersey between 2012 and the third quarter of 2016, the state claims.
Several other government entities have sued Insys as well, including, most recently, Minnesota, according to reports.
Kapoor previously pleaded not guilty in Boston to charges that he led a conspiracy involving doctors to overprescribe the painkiller.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCivil Reservations: An Important Tool for New Jersey Courts and Criminal Defendants
7 minute readFormer Fed Prosecutor Takes Leadership Role in NJ AG's Public Corruption Department
4 minute readNJ Supreme Court Weighs Scientific Reliability of Shaken Baby Syndrome
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First California Zantac Jury Ends in Mistrial
- 2Democrats Give Up Circuit Court Picks for Trial Judges in Reported Deal with GOP
- 3Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 4Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 5Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250