Pharma Sales Rep Pleads Guilty to Opioid Bribery Charges
The guilty plea comes as the state continues to pursue litigation against Insys Therapeutics Inc., the Arizona-based pharmaceutical company that has become the central target of the state's efforts to combat opioid abuse.
May 31, 2018 at 10:03 AM
3 minute read
A sales representative for Insys Therapeutics Inc., the opioid maker that has been the subject of mounting litigation of late, pleaded guilty in New Jersey on Wednesday to her part in an alleged scheme in which doctors were bribed to increase off-label prescriptions of painkiller Subsys.
The guilty plea comes as the state continues to pursue litigation against the Arizona-based pharmaceutical company, which has become the central target of the state's efforts to combat opioid abuse.
Michelle Breitenbach, 38, of Middletown, a New Jersey-based sales rep for the company, pleaded guilty before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Benjamin Bucca Jr. to a second-degree charge of conspiracy to commit commercial bribery, according to the Attorney General's Office.
A release said Breitenbach admitted that she participated in a scheme in which doctors, in return for off-label prescribing of Subsys, were paid kickbacks and bribes in the form of purported speaker fees for marketing and education events.
Breitenbach, the release said, faces a possible prison sentence of up to five years.
According to the release, doctors participated in the speaking engagements supposedly to inform other doctors about Subsys, but speakers were paid regardless of whether they spoke or if no one attended. Breitenbach claimed she was pressured from above at Insys to push the speaking programs, the office said.
Breitenbach's lawyer, Nicholas Harbist at the Princeton office of Blank Rome, didn't return a call for comment.
The state has alleged in a lawsuit that the founder of Insys, John Kapoor, and his company engaged in an illegal campaign to push sales of Subsys, a potent pain medication typically reserved for cancer patients. They are accused in the civil complaint of endangering the public through efforts to push drug sales illegally. The state alleges that two New Jersey state employee health benefit plans paid a total of approximately $10.3 million to reimburse Subsys prescriptions between 2012 and the third quarter of 2016, while the state workers' compensation program paid another $300,000. The lawsuit claims violation of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the New Jersey False Claims Act. The suit asks that Insys and Kapoor be assessed civil penalties, treble damages, and fees and costs.
The state's complaint alleges that Insys's corporate decision-makers, led by Kapoor, devised a strategy to expand what they recognized as a limited market for Subsys by aggressively pushing off-label uses of the drug, even to podiatrists and other specialty practitioners who typically would have little call to treat cancer patients or prescribe powerful Schedule II painkillers.
From the 2012 market launch of Subsys until the present, the drug has accounted for approximately 98 percent of net revenues for Insys, a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Chandler, Arizona, according to the suit. Insys, which has raised the price of Subsys every year since its launch, sold $74.2 million worth of the drug in New Jersey between 2012 and the third quarter of 2016, the state claims.
Several other government entities have sued Insys as well, including, most recently, Minnesota, according to reports.
Kapoor previously pleaded not guilty in Boston to charges that he led a conspiracy involving doctors to overprescribe the painkiller.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute read‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 2Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
- 3GOP-Led SEC Tightens Control Over Enforcement Investigations, Lawyers Say
- 4Transgender Care Fight Targets More Adults as Georgia, Other States Weigh Laws
- 5Roundup Special Master's Report Recommends Lead Counsel Get $0 in Common Benefit Fees
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250