13 Superior Court Judges Tenured
The New Jersey Senate late Thursday approved tenure for 13 sitting Superior Court judges from various vicinages, including five currently sitting in Passaic County.
June 21, 2018 at 10:00 PM
4 minute read
Credit: shutterstock
- Patrick Arre, now assigned to the Criminal Part in Hudson County. In the Law Journal's 2015 survey of Superior Court judges, Arre ranked 17th out of the 30 judges surveyed in the vicinage, with an overall score of 7.83 out of a possible 10. His highest score, 8.55, was for being unbiased as to race, gender or party identity. His lowest score, 7.44, was for being able to handle complex cases.
- Thomas Brown, currently assigned to the Criminal Part in Mercer County. In the survey, he ranked 15th out of the 16 judges scored in that vicinage, with a score of 6.50. His top score, 8.37, was for being unbiased. His low score, 5.63, was for his knowledge of substantive law.
- Regina Caulfield, now assigned to the Criminal Part in Union County, ranked eighth of the 20 judges scored in that vicinage, with a score of 8.55. Her best sore was 9.10, for being unbiased; her worst score, 7.97, for being able to skillfully foster settlement when appropriate.
- Randal Chiocca, now assigned to the Civil Part in Passaic. He ranked fifth out of the 19 judges scored there, with an overall score of 8.89. His highest score, 9.30, was for being unbiased, and his lowest score, 8.37, was for being able to move proceedings and make decisions quickly.
- Mark Ciarrocca, now assigned to the Civil Part in Union County. He came in fifth out of 20 with an overall score of 8.77. His highest score, 9.22, was for being unbiased, while his lowest score, 8.52, was for being able to handle complex cases.
- Kathleen Delaney, now assigned to the Criminal Part in Camden County. Out of the 21 judges scored in the vicinage, she finished ninth, with an overall score of 8.70. Her best score, 9.05, was for being unbiased, while her lowest score, 8.22, was for being able skillfully foster settlement when appropriate.
- Madelin Einbinder, who is the presiding judge of the Family Part in Ocean County. She ranked 11th out of the 17 judges scored in the vicinage with an overall score of 8.38. Her top score, 9.17, was for being courteous and respectful to litigants and lawyers. Her lowest score, 8.00, was for being able to handle complex cases.
- Donna Gallucio, now assigned to the Criminal Part in Passaic. She ranked 15th out of the vicinage's 19 scored judges with an overall score of 8.15. Her top score, 8.71, was for being unbiased, while her lowest, 7.86, was for moving cases and making decisions promptly.
- Lawrence Maron, now assigned to the Family Part in Passaic. He came in 12th out of 19, with an overall score of 8.53. His best score, 9.24, was for being courteous and respectful, while his low score, 7.83, was for being able to handle complex litigation.
- Sohail Mohammed, now assigned to the Criminal Part in Passaic. He finished 13th out of the 19 judges surveyed with an overall score of 8.46. His top score, 9.24, was for being unbiased; while his low score, 7.98, was for his ability to handle complex cases.
- Lisa Rose, currently assigned to the Civil Part in Hudson County. She ranked 12th out of the 30 judges scored there, with an overall score of 8.35. Her best score, 9.17, was for being unbiased. Her lowest score, 7.84, was for being able to handle complex cases.
- Janet Smith, now assigned to the Civil Part in Burlington County. She ranked last out of the 15 judges scored in that vicinage, with an overall rating of 7.10. His best score, 8.38, was for being unbiased; while her lowest score, 6.17, was for her ability to handle complex cases.
- Daniel Yablonsky, currently assigned to the Family Part in Passaic. He ranked 16th out of 19, with a score of 7.70. His best score, 8.85, was for being unbiased. His lowest score, 7.05, was for his ability to move proceedings and make decisions promptly.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1What Went Wrong With Adeel Mangi's Long, Strange Trip Through the Judicial Nomination Process?
- 2Defense Counsel Turns $2.2 Million Broward Jury Verdict to $500K
- 3United Soccer League Scores General Counsel
- 4Matt's Corner: RPC 8.4(d)—Conduct Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
- 5The Essential Role of Partnership Agreements in Health Care Private Practices
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250