$160M Settlement Approved in Class Suit Over Reimbursement of Ambulatory Surgical Centers
U.S. District Judge Kevin McNulty approved the settlement terms and granted $9 million in legal fees on Friday, ending a 12-year litigation saga over claims that New Jersey's largest health insurer shortchanged ambulatory surgical centers outside its provider network.
July 02, 2018 at 05:20 PM
4 minute read
A federal judge in Newark has granted final approval to a $160 million settlement on behalf of out-of-network ambulatory surgical centers which claimed the insurance company's policies did not provide adequate reimbursement for services rendered.
U.S. District Judge Kevin McNulty approved the settlement terms and granted $9 million in legal fees on Friday, ending a 12-year litigation saga over claims that New Jersey's largest health insurer shortchanged ambulatory surgical centers outside its provider network.
The suit that just settled, Edwards v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, was filed in February 2013. But the case was filed after a proposed $22 million settlement of another suit making similar claims, Glen Ridge SurgiCenter v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey, fell through in 2010 when more than 60 percent of the roughly 150 class members refused to be part of it.
When the Edwards complaint was filed, the plaintiffs had obtained some key evidence that it did not have in the previous case: documents related to a 2003 decision by Horizon to save money on its payments to ambulatory surgery centers and the company's hiring of a consultant that set new reimbursement rates in order to realize those savings. The class argued that the consultant's plan failed to consider applicable laws, regulations and contract terms. Horizon denied the allegations against it.
The settlement terms, first filed with the court in January, were reached following mediation with former U.S. District Judge Stephen Orlofsky, who is with Blank Rome in Princeton. Most of the $160 million has already been distributed in the form of payments to the 183 ambulatory surgical centers in the class over the past decade, said Bruce Nagel of Nagel Rice in Roseland, who represented class members. Those payments are the result of revised reimbursement policies adopted by Horizon during the course of the litigation. But two subclasses of claimants, those serving small employers and those who were allegedly underpaid based on the consultant's formula, are still awaiting additional payments of $4 million, Nagel said.
The current class representative, North Jersey Ambulatory Surgical Center, replaces Glen Ridge SurgiCenter. Glen Ridge settled with Horizon and was allowed to become an in-network provider. In November 2011, U.S. District Judge Jose Linares held that Glen Ridge settled only its own claims and that the case could go forward with a new named plaintiff.
The settlement was “incredibly well-received,” Nagel said: no class members objected to the settlement terms, and only two class members opted out of the settlement.
Horizon did not object to Nagel's fee petition of $9 million. Nagel Rice's partners billed at hourly rates ranging from $550 to $850 and associates from $350 to $450.
The plaintiffs are Barbara Edwards, bankruptcy trustee for former plaintiff Roxbury Surgical Center, which declared bankruptcy; and North Jersey Ambulatory Surgical Center.
Nagel represented the class along with Robert Solomon of his firm and West Orange attorney Robert Prupis.
David Jay and Philip Sellinger of Greenberg Traurig in Florham Park represented Horizon Blue Cross Blue Sheild. Jay referred a reporter's questions directly to the client.
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield spokesman Tom Vincz said in a statement, “This was a long and protracted settlement in which the plaintiffs initially demanded many multiples of the final settlement amount. Over the years, litigants dropped out of the case and/or settled on their own. This settlement represents final closure of the matter.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBilling Rate Hikes 'Not Slowing Down,' With Pricing Surges Expected in 2024
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250