Ballot Question Interpretive Statements Subject to Public Review, Appellate Division Rules
"[W]e perceive no legislative intent to vest a borough administrator ... with the authority to submit an interpretive statement with a referendum ballot," said Appellate Division Judge Scott Moynihan in "DeSanctis v. Belmar."
July 09, 2018 at 03:14 PM
1 minute read
has ruled DeSanctis v. Belmar
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
We Applaud NJ Supreme Court's Balanced Rules for Reinstatement of Disbarred Attorneys
4 minute read
On the Move and After Hours: Connell Foley; Lindabury; Day Pitney; Archer
7 minute read
NJ Supreme Court Steps In to Dismiss Controversial Ethics Complaint Against Mercer County Presiding Judge
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
