Whole Foods Not Liable for Worker's Vandalized Car, NJ Court Rules
"We are convinced that the trial court erred in concluding that Whole Foods had a duty to protect plaintiff's vehicle from vandalism," Appellate Division Judges Harry Carroll and Patrick DeAlmeida said.
July 11, 2018 at 01:47 PM
1 minute read
Photo: Steve Heap/Shutterstock.com Kandrac v. Marrazzo's Market
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
On the Move and After Hours: Connell Foley; Lindabury; Day Pitney; Archer
7 minute read
NJ Supreme Court Steps In to Dismiss Controversial Ethics Complaint Against Mercer County Presiding Judge
5 minute read
CEO Sues Blogger Who 'Sought to Destroy' Reputation of His Pro Athlete Company
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2A&O Shearman Adopts 3-Level Lockstep Pay Model Amid Shift to All-Equity Partnership
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 5A RICO Surge Is Underway: Here's How the Allstate Push Might Play Out
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
