Compliance Officer's Suit vs. NJ Economic Development Authority Trimmed, But Clears Hurdle
U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson said the plaintiff can pursue a hostile work environment claim, but knocked out claims lodged under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, the New Jersey Civil Rights Act or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
August 02, 2018 at 02:34 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge has ruled that a Haitian-American former employee of the New Jersey Economic Development Authority can pursue a hostile work environment claim.
But U.S. District Judge Freda Wolfson, sitting in Trenton, also knocked out plaintiff Lude Jasmin's claims lodged under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination, the New Jersey Civil Rights Act or the Age Discrimination in Employment Act in her July 30 ruling, in part because of sovereign immunity.
“Arms of the state—including agencies, departments, and officials—are entitled to immunity,” and plaintiffs cannot file NJLAD allegations against a state body in federal court, Wolfson said.
Still, Jasmin is a member of a protected class, Wolfson said. “As such, I find plaintiff has met her pleading requirements” to pursue a federal civil rights claim under Title VII, she wrote.
Jasmin was employed as a compliance officer with the EDA in January 2014. The decision does not say when she started, but did note that she previously had been an EDA contractor. Her job at the EDA was to evaluate and expedite claims from Superstorm Sandy victims, according to the court.
In her lawsuit, Jasmin, claiming she was the ”only black person” in the office, alleges that her work was often ignored or that her partner received credit for work they did together. Jasmin said she believed the actions were taken to justify poor performance reports.
Jasmin also alleges that work was withheld from her, that her work was erased from the EDA's computer system, and that she was forced to use computer screenshots to prove that she had performed tasks. When it became public knowledge that she was taking screenshots, erasures of her work ceased, the lawsuit said.
At one point, her supervisor, who had been sympathetic, left, and the supervisor's replacement sent Jasmin a text that said, “Now you're my n—–,” the lawsuit claims.
“Here, plaintiff does not allege that the text message came from a coworker; rather, the message was allegedly sent by a supervisor,” Wolfson noted.
“Title VII prohibits discriminatory conduct that is 'sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the condition of the victim's employment and create an abusive work environment,'” Wolfson wrote, quoting from case law.
Jasmin is represented by Clifford Stewart of the Newark law office of Gregory Stewart. He did not return a call about the ruling.
The Attorney General's Office, which represents the EDA, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250