Give Victims Their Voices Back
OP-ED: The Law Journal Editorial Board's commentary opposing the legislation making nondisclosure agreements unenforceable against the victims of harassment and discrimination misses the point.
August 03, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The Law Journal Editorial Board's commentary opposing the legislation making nondisclosure agreements unenforceable against the victims of harassment and discrimination misses the point (“Banning Nondisclosure Agreements May Hurt More Than Help,” New Jersey Law Journal, July 30, 2018). The law does not “compel victims to sacrifice their own privacy” as the editorial claims. Nothing in the law requires an employee to reveal her harassment or settlement. And the employer never wants to reveal it—that's why for the 38 years that I have represented employees it has always been, without exception, the employer who demands an NDA.
What the law passed by the New Jersey Senate and pending in the Assembly does do is give victims their voices back. It makes it illegal for an employer to tell a victim of harassment or discrimination to just take some money and shut up.
CBS head Les Moonves is the latest powerful man to be accused of decades of harassment of women and retaliation against those who reject him or complain. Harvey Weinstein, Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly, Matt Lauer, Bill Cosby … the list gets longer and longer, of men who have ruined women's careers and harassed unabated for years and years, partly because NDAs prevented women from telling their stories. The #MeToo movement has shown that the editorial is wrong. Women do want to share their stories. They are empowered by other women speaking out. Many women with NDAs have spoken eloquently against them, most recently in the New York Times review of the MeToo movement.
Years of lawsuits and settlements have not made a dent in sexual harassment, which the editorial calls a “private interest.” But the public has an interest in stopping workplace abuse—our Supreme Court has stated this repeatedly. The current climate shows us that women are tired of being paid some money to leave work and shut up while the harasser stays to harass again. Without NDAs employers will be forced to actually address the problem—and the “problem” isn't the woman, which is how women who complain are treated now.
Cases still settle, and life goes on in the public sector without NDAs. The private sector can adapt as well, and maybe grow to see that women are not expendable, men are not more important, and harassment is bad business.
Nancy Erika Smith is a partner with Smith Mullin in Montclair. Her practice is dedicated to employment law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute readAppellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
5 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute read'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cannabis Took a Hit on Red Wednesday, but Hope Is On the Way
- 2Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 3People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 4How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 5Bar Report - Dec. 23
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250