Give Victims Their Voices Back
OP-ED: The Law Journal Editorial Board's commentary opposing the legislation making nondisclosure agreements unenforceable against the victims of harassment and discrimination misses the point.
August 03, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
The Law Journal Editorial Board's commentary opposing the legislation making nondisclosure agreements unenforceable against the victims of harassment and discrimination misses the point (“Banning Nondisclosure Agreements May Hurt More Than Help,” New Jersey Law Journal, July 30, 2018). The law does not “compel victims to sacrifice their own privacy” as the editorial claims. Nothing in the law requires an employee to reveal her harassment or settlement. And the employer never wants to reveal it—that's why for the 38 years that I have represented employees it has always been, without exception, the employer who demands an NDA.
What the law passed by the New Jersey Senate and pending in the Assembly does do is give victims their voices back. It makes it illegal for an employer to tell a victim of harassment or discrimination to just take some money and shut up.
CBS head Les Moonves is the latest powerful man to be accused of decades of harassment of women and retaliation against those who reject him or complain. Harvey Weinstein, Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly, Matt Lauer, Bill Cosby … the list gets longer and longer, of men who have ruined women's careers and harassed unabated for years and years, partly because NDAs prevented women from telling their stories. The #MeToo movement has shown that the editorial is wrong. Women do want to share their stories. They are empowered by other women speaking out. Many women with NDAs have spoken eloquently against them, most recently in the New York Times review of the MeToo movement.
Years of lawsuits and settlements have not made a dent in sexual harassment, which the editorial calls a “private interest.” But the public has an interest in stopping workplace abuse—our Supreme Court has stated this repeatedly. The current climate shows us that women are tired of being paid some money to leave work and shut up while the harasser stays to harass again. Without NDAs employers will be forced to actually address the problem—and the “problem” isn't the woman, which is how women who complain are treated now.
Cases still settle, and life goes on in the public sector without NDAs. The private sector can adapt as well, and maybe grow to see that women are not expendable, men are not more important, and harassment is bad business.
Nancy Erika Smith is a partner with Smith Mullin in Montclair. Her practice is dedicated to employment law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute readAppellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
5 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute read'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250