In Praise of New Gender Identity Law
It is estimated that there are 30,100 transgender/gender-diverse people living in New Jersey. We welcome these legislative efforts to protect our neighbors and allow them the right to amend vital records to be consistent with their gender identity.
August 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM
3 minute read
When Gov. Murphy signed a package of bills on July 3, 2018, New Jersey joined 16 other states that allow residents to change their gender on birth certificates and death records in order to conform to their gender identity without submission of proof of surgery, and joined three other states that include a gender-neutral option on birth certificates.
P.L. 2018, c. 58 requires the state registrar of vital statistics, upon submission of a request, to issue an amended certificate of birth to a person born in New Jersey who submits such request. Under prior law, such amended certificate of birth was only issued upon the receipt of a medical certificate from the applicant's physician, indicating the person's gender had been changed through surgery. A person now need only complete a form which affirms under penalty of perjury that the request for a change in gender, including female, male or undesignated/non-binary, is made for the purpose of conforming with that person's gender identity and not for any fraudulent purpose. The amended certificate will not indicate that it has been amended. The prior record will be sealed and only opened pursuant to a court order or by the person who is the subject of the birth certificate, or the person if a minor, a parent or guardian. For residents of this state who were born elsewhere and such state or foreign jurisdiction requires a court order to amend a birth certificate to reflect a change in gender, a court in New Jersey has jurisdiction to issue such order after ascertaining that the purpose is for conforming with gender identity and not for fraudulent purpose.
P.L. 2018, c. 59 also allows the sex of the decedent to be recorded to reflect the decedent's gender identity as reported by the person with the right to control the funeral and disposition. Documentation of a gender transition can include, but is not limited to, the decedent's written instructions, including in an advance health care directive; a court order approving a name or gender change; proof of clinical treatment for gender transition; or the gender marker on a birth certificate, or a state- or federally issued identification card.
Finally, P.L. 2018 c. 60 establishes a Transgender Equality Task Force of 17 members “to assess legal and societal barriers to equality” and recommend future laws to prevent discrimination. Areas of concern are health care, education, housing, employment, and criminal justice.
It is estimated that there are 30,100 transgender/gender-diverse people living in New Jersey. We welcome these legislative efforts to protect our neighbors and allow them the right to amend vital records to be consistent with their gender identity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute readAppellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
5 minute readWhere CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute read'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 2As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 3General Warrants and ESI
- 4GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 5Authenticating Electronic Signatures
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250