Spinal Injuries in Bank Parking Lot Fall Lead to $7 Million Settlement in Middlesex
A plaintiff will receive $7 million in his Middlesex County suit, Vaidya v. Bank of America, as compensation for injuries he sustained when he slipped…
August 13, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
A plaintiff will receive $7 million in his Middlesex County suit, Vaidya v. Bank of America, as compensation for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell in an icy parking lot.
Plaintiff Chetan Vaidya, now 53, of Plainsboro, agreed to the settlement with the defendants on June 29 after a series of conferences before Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Jamie Happas, said Vaidya's attorney, Nicholas Leonardis.
Vaidya was injured on Feb. 9, 2015, in the parking lot of a Bank of America branch on Route 518 in Rocky Hill, said Leonardis, of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison.
The parking lot was covered with ice and had not been salted, Leonardis said. He slipped and fell as he attempted to step onto a sidewalk while going to the bank's ATM.
Vaidya struck his head and body on the parking lot, rendering him a quadriplegic and causing partial vocal chord paralysis, Leonardis said.
Vaidya, after surgery and physical therapy, has regained the power to walk and drive a car, but has not been able to return to work, Leonardis said.
Vaidya sued Bank of America; CBRE, the building owner; a subcontractor, Brickman Group; and the company it hired to maintain the sidewalk, Best Landscaping.
ACE American Insurance Co. represented Best, and contributed $1 million toward to the settlement, Leonardis said, while American General Insurance and Liability and Zurich American Insurance Co. will pay the remainder as umbrella carriers, Leonardis said.
Jared Duvoisin, of Newark's Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, represented Bank of America, CBRE and Brickman. Lane Ferdinand, who runs a firm in Springfield, represented Best.
Both confirmed the amount of the settlement.
— Michael Booth
$400K UIM Pre-Suit Settlement
Dunn v. Fidelity & Guaranty: A pedestrian struck by a vehicle in a convenience store parking lot recovered $500,000 for her injuries, including a $400,000 settlement in under-insured motorist claim reached prior to suit being filed in court.
On July 5, 2015, Barbara Dunn visited the 7-Eleven store on Bridge Avenue in Point Pleasant. Upon exiting the store, she began crossing the parking lot to return to her home on the other side of the street when a vehicle driven by Robert Hart of Point Pleasant entering the parking lot struck her, throwing her onto the hood of the vehicle and then onto the parking lot surface, said her lawyer, Andrew Renda Jr. of Renda & Voynick in Cedar Grove.
Dunn, currently 62, sustained a displaced, comminuted fracture to her left knee, which she claimed has a permanent effect. She underwent one surgery with implantation of hardware, and two subsequent arthroscopic surgeries to address inflammation and remove scar tissue, Renda said, noting that she has permanent issues with mobility.
Dunn filed suit against Hart, claiming he was not paying attention when he pulled into the parking lot, and that claim previously settled for his $100,000 policy limit, according to Renda.
She then filed an under-insured motorist claim with her auto carrier, Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance, which proceeded to arbitration before a three-member panel. Fidelity didn't dispute causation, Renda said.
Following discovery, the panel in January 2018 awarded $600,000, meaning a net award of $500,000 including a credit for the $100,000 settlement with Hart, Renda said. Fidelity rejected the award, clearing the way for the dispute to go to court, but the parties settled prior to the complaint being filed, in late April, for the policy limit of $400,000, he said.
The sum was paid on May 14, according to Renda.
Fidelity's counsel, Michael Mourtzanakis of William E. Staehle's Morristown firm, did not reply to a request for comment.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250