Photo courtesy of shutterstockServers Allege NJ Restaurant Owners 'Taxed' Their Tip Money
The lawsuit alleges that the restaurant owners engaged in what the servers called a "tax," in which the owners took up to 4 percent of the servers' tips at the end of each shift.
August 14, 2018 at 05:00 PM
2 minute read
Former servers at a trio of southern New Jersey restaurants have filed a putative class action claiming that the owners illegally took a portion of their tips to pay for the owners' expenses.
Named as defendants are Octavio Coppola and Biagio Coppola, the owners of Tarantella Ristorante in Medford, Femmina Italian Grill in Medford, and Chianti Ristorante Italiano in Mullica Hill. The lawsuit was filed Monday in Camden County Superior Court on behalf of the three plaintiffs—Anthony Neidle, Alissa Ragona and Christian Hardman—by Joseph D'Aversa of DeNittis Osefchen Prince in Marlton.
The lawsuit, seeking certification of a class, alleges that the Coppolas engaged in what the servers called a “Coppola Tax,” in which the owners took up to 4 percent of the servers' tips at the end of each shift, in violation of the New Jersey Wage Payment Law.
“Servers in restaurants work very hard and, in many cases, for not much money,” D'Aversa Osefchen said in a statement. “They depend almost exclusively on tips to earn a decent living.”
Both Coppolas were unavailable for comment.
D'Aversa said the putative class could grow by 40 more current and former employees who were affected by the Coppola's alleged practices. He declined to comment further on the lawsuit.
The lawsuit alleges misappropriation, breach of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment. In addition to class certification, the plaintiffs are seeking restitution, an injunction, and counsel fees and costs.
“Defendants have pursued an unlawful, uniform policy of regularly and systematically taking and converting gratuities paid to the class and using them to pay the expenses and legal obligations of the defendants,” the complaint said.
“Plaintiffs and the class have endured significant economic damages,” the complaint added.
The lawsuit alleges that the practice of taking servers' tips has gone on for at least six years.
Neidle, the lawsuit said, worked at Tarantella from December 2014 to January 2018. Ragona worked at Tarantella from November 2008 to April 2017. Hardman worked at Femmina from 2011 to 2012 and at Tarantella from 2015 to 2018.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read
On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute read
Construction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute read
Eagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
