Court OKs 'Portee' Claim for Same-Sex Spouse in Child Death Case
"A rational jury can find that Benning was a de facto mother to the child, and felt her loss as deeply as any parent facing that horrific event," wrote Appellate Division Judge Jose Fuentes.
August 17, 2018 at 04:12 PM
5 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court ruled that the nonbiological mother in a same-sex couple can sue for bystander negligent infliction of emotional distress in connection with the death of a 2-year-old Trenton girl in a horrific accident.
When Portee v. Jaffe was decided decades ago, the Appellate Division said, “The notion of same-sex couples and their children constituting a 'familial relationship' worthy of legal recognition was considered by a significant number of our fellow citizens as socially and morally repugnant and legally absurd.
“The overwhelming number of our fellow citizens now unequivocally reject this shameful, morally untenable bigotry; our laws, both legislatively and through judicial decisions, now recognize and protect the rights of LGBTQ people to equal dignity and treatment under law,” the court said Aug. 17 in Moreland v. Parks.
The panel's ruling overturned a ruling by Mercer County Superior Court Judge William Anklowitz, who said plaintiff Valeria Benning had not developed a sufficient emotional and familial relationship with the young girl, I'Maya Moreland, to support a Portee claim, and dismissed the claim on summary judgment.
“A rational jury can find that Benning was a de facto mother to the child, and felt her loss as deeply as any parent facing that horrific event,” wrote Appellate Division Judge Jose Fuentes. Judges Thomas Manahan and Karen Suter joined in the ruling.
I'Asia Moreland was the biological mother of I'Maya Moreland, and is the mother of an older son, I'Zhir Moreland, the court said. Moreland and Benning lived together as a married couple with the children, according to the decision.
The accident occurred on Jan. 30, 2009, as Moreland, Benning, the two children and Benning's live-in stepson, Armanti Martinez, were waiting to cross Route 129 in Trenton to get to the Sun Bank Arts Center to attend a performance of “Disney on Ice,” according to the decision.
Benning was holding I'Maya Moreland's hand when a city firetruck, driven by Firefighter Ronald Hubscher, collided with a pickup truck driven by a man named William Parks. Parks' pickup truck struck Moreland, propelling her 65 feet from the accident site. She died as the result of her injuries.
The family's attorney, Robin Lord, filed lawsuits against multiple defendants, including the city, Mercer County, Hubscher and Parks. One of those claims was for negligent infliction of emotional distress on behalf of Benning.
Anklowitz dismissed that claim on summary judgment, saying Benning did not present sufficient evidence that she has an “intimate familial relationship” with I'Maya Moreland to make out a claim under the state Supreme Court's 1980 ruling in Portee.
Garden State Equality, an organization supporting gay rights groups, and the New Jersey State Bar Association, asked to participate as amici. They argued that Benning did not have to be a legally recognized member of I'Asia Moreland's family to sustain her claim.
The appeals court agreed.
“We conclude the motion judge erred in dismissing Benning's claim under Portee as a matter of law,” Fuentes said.
The appeals court noted that I'Asia Moreland and Benning met in 2007, while Moreland was working at a sporting good store and Benning was a customer. The two exchanged phone numbers and soon began dating. The two then moved in together, and Moreland's two children began calling Benning, who became intimately involved in maintaining the household, “mom.” Moreland and Benning married in 2014, about a year after same-sex marriage was legalized in New Jersey.
Anklowitz, according tot the opinion, referred to the two women as “lovers,” and that their relationship was “family-ish.” He said they had been together 17 months at most and that there was no evidence of a personal bond between Benning and I'Maya.
The Appellate Division initially refused to hear an appeal, but the Supreme Court ordered it to review the issue.
“What constitutes a 'familial relationship' is perforce a fact-sensitive analysis, driven by social and moral forces,” Fuentes said. “No one can question that the social and moral concept of 'family' has significantly evolved since the court decided Portee in 1980.”
At that time, he said, non-heterosexuals were shunned, ostracized and unprotected by the state's anti-discrimination laws.
Now, same-sex relationships are nearly universally accepted.
“The evidence shows that at the time of the accident, Benning and her now wife I'Asia Moreland, had cohabited for at least 17 months, sharing the responsibility for the care of the children,” Fuentes said.
Robin Kay Lord, who heads a firm in Trenton, represented Benning and said she is grateful that appeals court ruled in the family's favor. “I'm surprised that it took this long in this day and age,” she said.
Cherry Hill solo John Morelli represented the city. Mercer County was represented by assistant county counsel Lillian Nazzaro. Elizabeth Chierici of Moorestown's Chierici, Chierici & Smith represented Parks. William O'Kane Jr. of Archer & Greiner in Haddonfield represented Hubscher. None returned calls seeking comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Judges: Senate Confirms 7 Superior Court Nominees in Final 2024 Session
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250