BAR REPORT - Capitol Report
Judiciary updates security on web-based programs
August 20, 2018 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
Judiciary updates security on web-based programs
The Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) has announced the start of p-synch—password synchronization that requires users to electronically reset passwords every 90 days. All users must complete the initial password process through p-synch no later than 5 p.m. Oct. 14 in order to avoid disruption in access to the Judiciary's applications.
The upgrade is part of the Judiciary's efforts to keep up with industry security standards as set forth in the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework. In addition to changing passwords every 90 days, users will have to choose and answer three personal security questions that will later allow them to reset their password if the account becomes disabled. Users of the Judiciary's web-based programs, including attorney registration, eCourts, eCDR, eTRO, eVNF, EM, MACS and DVCR, are encouraged to update their passwords.
Directive requires judges to report family member involvement, commercial involvement in litigation; updates transfers of venue requirements
The Supreme Court issued a policy clarifying the reporting requirements for judges and justices with respect to a personal or immediate family member's involvement in litigation, and updating the parameters for transfers of venue to another forum. The directive also modifies the procedures for judges to report both the involvement in litigation and disposition of the matter, and incorporates new protocols for notice to the parties and transfer of venue. Directive #11-18 supersedes prior Directive 7-11, and is effective immediately.
Section A is relative to reporting requirements, and requires judges to report their own involvement or immediate family involvement in any type of litigation—contested or uncontested—in any state or federal court or administrative tribunal. It also calls for reporting personal or commercial involvement in any proceeding in bankruptcy court and/or the personal or commercial involvement in a bankruptcy proceeding of a spouse, civil union partner or domestic partner domiciled with the judge.
In municipal court, judges must report their own involvement or immediate family member involvement in litigation—contested or uncontested—for all disorderly persons, petty disorderly persons, and driving while intoxicated matters. Further, judges must report their involvement or immediate family involvement in uncontested or contested litigation in all other municipal court matters, including ordinance violations and traffic tickets where a court appearance is required or scheduled. This includes matters where a judge is personally named and those in which the judge is a party in interest.
Further reporting requirements require judges who have an immediate family member who regularly appears in any New Jersey state or municipal court as an attorney, expert witness, police officer, or other participant, to file a one-time notice provided by the AOC. The notice must be updated if there is a change in circumstance.
Transfers of venue will be required where the judge sits and the litigation involves the judge or immediate family member who is either a party or witness, or when an immediate family member has employment requiring regular court appearances. Notice must be provided in advance to the parties, identifying the conflict and affording the parties an opportunity to object.
For a copy of the policy and the forms, go to njcourts.gov/notices/2018 or contact Meryl G. Nadler, counsel to the administrative director, at 609-815-2900, ext. 52400.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![On the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA On the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/07/Alan-Lesnewich-767x633.jpg)
On the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute read![On the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ On the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2023/06/2023-AFBNJ-Officers-767x633.jpg)
On the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250