Women in Law Study Yields Troublesome Results
The situation warrants further serious attention. We look for a healthy debate, both public and in the halls of corporate, government and private law offices, of steps to be taken.
August 20, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Credit: ImageFlow/Shutterstock.com
When taking office as ABA president last summer, Hilarie Bass announced a year-long study of why the proportion of female lawyers in the ranks of senior lawyers does not match the proportion in law school or in the beginning years in the profession. Great progress has been made in encouraging women to enter the law, at or above their representation in the population; they just continue to leave earlier than their male counterparts.
So what has happened in the intervening months? There were forums at Harvard and Northwestern, focus groups, statistical studies, and a panel discussion at the ABA Convention in Chicago in early August 2018. A more formal written report is promised for September.
That differences remain is shown by several statistical comparisons discussed in Chicago:
- 81 percent of women say they were mistaken for a lower-level employee, but this didn't happen to men.
- 60 percent of women said they'd left firms because of care-taking commitments, compared to 46 percent of men.
- 54 percent of women said they were responsible for arranging child care, as opposed to 1 percent of men.
- 39 percent of women said the task of cooking meals fell on their shoulders, compared to 11 percent of men.
- 34 percent of women say they leave work for children's needs, versus 5 percent of men.
Another set of numbers is particularly interesting, though not wholly surprising. While law firm managers were fairly optimistic as to several metrics—for example, how much attention is given to the issue and whether progress is being made—women were markedly less so.
- Firm leaders are active advocates (82 percent of managing partners agreed vs. 61 percent of women lawyers).
- The firm promotes women into leadership (75 percent of managing partners agreed vs. 54 percent of women lawyers).
- Gender diversity is a priority (79 percent of managing partners agreed vs. 54 percent of women lawyers).
- The firm promotes women into equity (71 percent of managing partners agreed vs. 47 percent of women lawyers).
- The firm has been successful at retention (64 percent of managing partners agreed vs. 46 percent of women lawyers).
A particularly troublesome example of why women leave is that, compared to their male colleagues, women feel they are not given recognition for their successes. This leads to lower job satisfaction and likely is emblematic of continuing biases.
These statistics mirror the findings in a recent comparable report by the International Bar Association.
The situation warrants further serious attention. We look for the full report in September and a healthy debate, both public and in the halls of corporate, government and private law offices, of steps to be taken.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![ABC's $16M Settlement With Trump Sets Bad Precedent in Uncertain Times ABC's $16M Settlement With Trump Sets Bad Precedent in Uncertain Times](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/65/80/9408e1774e6e882ef9512a06452a/trump-stephanopoulos-767x633.jpg)
ABC's $16M Settlement With Trump Sets Bad Precedent in Uncertain Times
8 minute read![Regulating Charities: A Small Suggestion Regulating Charities: A Small Suggestion](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/dd/09/40dd38ff407c8cf20c3658260522/online-donation-767x633.jpg)
![As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/37/07/d64e3f2f46f68638c705d2add5aa/child-abuse-767x633-2.jpg)
As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute read![Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ff/16/5f03b14e4e59a036800678f9cb41/piggy-bank-adobestock-588844438-by-michael-767x633.jpg)
Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Feasting, Pledging, and Wagering, Philly Attorneys Prepare for Super Bowl
- 2Special Section: 2025 Real Estate Trends
- 3Snap Paid $63M in Fees to 2 Am Law 200 Firms in '24
- 4Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
- 5Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250