NJ Insurance Regulators Targeting NRA-Backed Policies
New Jersey insurance regulators have launched an investigation of gun-owner policies promoted by the National Rifle Association, alleging that they are not licensed in the state.
August 22, 2018 at 02:12 PM
4 minute read
New Jersey insurance regulators have launched an investigation of gun-owner policies promoted by the National Rifle Association, alleging that they are not licensed in the state.
In a statement released Tuesday night, Gov. Phil Murphy said the state Department of Banking and Insurance is investigating the marketing and sale of the insurance policies.
Under scrutiny are Lockton Affinity of Overland Park, Kansas, which has been selling policies under its “Carry Guard Program,” and Illinois Union, a subsidiary of the Chubb Group of Insurance Cos., for its role as the underwriter of the insurance policies, according to the release.
The NRA has denied wrongdoing, while Lockton has vowed to work with state regulators on the issues raised.
The move by New Jersey comes less than a month after the administration of New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo began taking steps to block the sale of the policies in that state, and to start levying fines on the companies.
Cuomo has written a letter to governors from around the country, asking them to take similar measures.
“In New York, we refuse to be beholden to the NRA or allow such a reckless and illegal program that puts lives at risk. Too many lives have been lost to guns in this country, including those lost in more than 200 mass shootings this year alone, to let the NRA continue to market illegal products that promote violence,” Cuomo said in his letter. “Upon discovering the breach of our laws, we issued civil violations that immediately ended the sale of these unlawful products.”
The NRA has filed a lawsuit against New York, alleging that the Cuomo administration is attempting to force the gun-rights advocacy group into insolvency.
New Jersey DOBI Commissioner Marlene Caride also issued a statement.
“New Jersey law requires insurance companies selling to residents within the state to comply with specific requirements,” she said. “The department has reviewed findings by the New York Department of Financial Services associated with the marketing and sale of Carry Guard insurance in New York and is examining the marketing and sale of this product in New Jersey to determine if, and to what extent, this activity violated state insurance laws.”
DOBI said it has contacted both Lockton and Illinois Union. A preliminary investigation by DOBI found that Lockton marketed and sold Carry Guard insurance to New Jersey residents, and that coverage remains in effect in the state, according to the release.
Among the findings by New York was that the NRA, though it lacked a license from the New York Department of Financial Services to conduct insurance business in that state, actively marketed and solicited for the Carry Guard program through a website, email, and direct mail, among other channels.
The NRA is not licensed to sell insurance in New Jersey, regulators said.
The statement said the NRA's Carry Guard insurance program is advertised as personal firearms liability insurance, which would provide coverage for self-defense for those who lawfully carry firearms and their families, including protection against civil liability, the cost to defend against civil and criminal legal actions, and immediate access to attorney referrals. The coverage is advertised as including supplementary payments as needed for bail, criminal defense legal retainer fees, and other costs, the release said.
Dean Davison, a spokesman for Lockton Affinity, issued a statement: “Lockton Affinity has received an inquiry from the state of New Jersey. We take compliance matters seriously and will work with state regulators to address any concerns. Lockton has been in business for more than 50 years and our commitment to regulatory compliance and doing what's best for our clients is unwavering.”
An attorney for the NRA, William Brewer III, commented on behalf of the NRA.
“The NRA acted appropriately at all times,” said Brewer, of Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors in Dallas. “Since 2000, the NRA relied upon Lockton and its assurances that the insurance programs in question complied with all applicable state regulations.
“To the extent there are questions about Carry Guard being sold as a lawful self-defense insurance program, the NRA relied upon Lockton to administer the program and oversee its availability to New Jersey consumers,” he said.
Illinois Union did not respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250