Criminal Charges Against NJ Solar Energy Company Reinstated
In a published ruling, State v. Bernarndi, the three-judge Appellate Division panel said three of the six counts against the company, Strategic Environmental Partners, and its director and managing member, Richard Bernardi Sr., were wrongly dismissed based on the mistaken reasoning that an administrative consent order didn't amount to a government contract.
August 28, 2018 at 03:29 PM
4 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court on Tuesday reinstated criminal charges against a solar energy development company and its director accused of violating an administrative consent order meant to assist in building a solar farm on the site of an old landfill.
In a published ruling, State v. Bernarndi, the three-judge Appellate Division panel said three of the six counts against the company, Strategic Environmental Partners, and its director and managing member, Richard Bernardi Sr., were wrongly dismissed based on the mistaken reasoning that an administrative consent order didn't amount to a government contract.
The matter began in 2006, when Strategic Environmental Partners began discussing with the state Department of Environmental Protection about a plan to install solar panels on a Roxbury property it bought in 2011 from a company called Sussex and Warren Holding Corp.
According to the court, the property contained a landfill, the Fenimore Landfill, that had been closed for 30 years. The entire site was contaminated and in need of remediation. During the negotiations, the DEP had expressed doubts about the company's ability to finance the project, especially since the company was unable to obtain a performance bond, the decision said.
Instead, Strategic Environmental Partners proposed using tipping fees at the site, to be paid by a developer, plus expected revenues from its solar panel project, to pay $2.3 million into an escrow account. The DEP agreed, and the agency and the company entered into an administrative consent order.
According to the decision, Strategic Environmental Partners ultimately paid only $250 into the escrow account. It disclosed that it owed Sussex-Warren $950,000 on a mortgage lien. Additionally, the DEP learned that $1.5 million had been paid to Bernardi and his family in 2013 and 2014, the court noted.
The matter was referred to a state grand jury, which returned a six-count indictment. There were five charges against both Strategic Environmental Partners and Bernardi: second-degree false representations for a government contract; second-degree theft by deception, in connection with their dealings with the DEP; another second-degree theft by deception charge, for their dealings with Sussex-Warren; first-degree financial facility of criminal activity; and second-degree theft of services. The sixth count was against Bernardi only—a second-degree charge of misconduct by a corporate officer.
The first four counts of the indictment were dismissed in Morris County Superior Court because, the judge said, an administrative consent order didn't amount to a contract between a private company and a government agency, and there was no evidence to indicate that Strategic Environmental Partners had failed to live up to any contractual agreement to provide goods or services.
But the Appellate Division reinstated three counts of the indictment—second-degree false representation for a government contract, the theft-by-deception charge related to the DEP, and the first-degree financial facilitation of criminal activity charge—ruling that an administrative consent order carries the weight of a government contract.
“A contract has long been interpreted as 'an agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law' and a 'writing that sets forth such an agreement,'” wrote Appellate Division Judge Francis Vernoia for the appeals court, quoting Black's Law Dictionary. Judges Carmen Messano and Amy O'Connor joined in the ruling.
“The ACO is an agreement between defendants and the NJDEP which, by its express terms, may be enforced by the parties,” Vernoia said.
“The ACO is no different than a consent order in that it incorporates the contractual agreement of the parties and also constitutes an order … requiring compliance with its terms,” Vernoia said.
The panel agreed, however, that count four was rightly dismissed because there was no evidence that the company was attempting to defraud Sussex-Warren in its mortgage, which the court said was more akin to a lien on the property.
The Attorney General's Office, which represented the DEP, did not respond to a request for comment.
John Azzarello of Whipple Azzarello in Morristown represented both Strategic Environmental Partners and Bernardi. He could not be reached.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 2Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
- 3Texas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
- 4Quinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
- 5Manufacturer Must Provide Details Surrounding Expert’s Livestreamed Inspection, Fed Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250