Suit Over NJ Law Firm's Online Marketing Practices Dropped
A suit accusing a New Jersey law firm of using Google's marketing services to hijack a competitor's clients has been dismissed after the defendant firm agreed not to engage in such tactics.
August 28, 2018 at 02:40 PM
4 minute read
A suit accusing a New Jersey law firm of using Google's marketing services to hijack a competitor's clients has been dismissed after the defendant firm agreed not to engage in such tactics.
Hark & Hark of Cherry Hill was named in a trademark infringement suit filed in June by fellow South Jersey firm Helmer, Conley & Kasselman, which claimed the Hark firm used Google's sponsored search feature to lure prospective clients who were seeking information about Helmer Conley.
Helmer Conley voluntarily dismissed the suit Aug. 22, after U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman of the District of New Jersey permanently enjoined Hark & Hark from engaging in the online activities that were the basis of the suit.
Those alleged activities included purchasing or bidding on keywords from search engine operators that are identical or similar to Helmer Conley's name, and making use of Helmer Conley's name in any way in connection with its advertising if it is in a manner likely to confuse actual or potential clients.
Hark & Hark also agreed in the consent decree to provide a sworn declaration that it has canceled any and all contracts with search engine operators for keywords that are identical or substantially similar to Helmer Conley's name.
In addition, Hark & Hark agreed to pay Helmer Conley's legal fees and costs in connection with the case, according to the latter firm's counsel in the case, Benjamin Folkman of Folkman Law Offices in Cherry Hill.
“My client was not trying to get anything out of this, other than to get them to stop what they were doing, and they're satisfied,” Folkman said.
Steven Angstreich of Weir & Partners in Cherry Hill, who represented Hark & Hark, did not return a call about the dismissal of the case.
The suit accused Hark & Hark of contracting with Google's AdWords online advertising service to draw traffic to its website from those conducting a Google search related to Helmer Conley, based in Haddon Heights. The suit brought claims under the Lanham Act for false advertising, and under New Jersey's unfair competition and identity theft statutes, as well as common-law claims for unfair competition, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, commercial appropriation of name or likeness, unjust enrichment, and negligent enablement of imposter fraud.
The suit claimed people conducting Google searches on terms such as “Helmer law office” or “Helmer lawyer” yielded search results with the heading “Helmer Conley Kasselman, Aggressive Criminal Defense,” but the search results themselves listed the New Jersey street address and telephone number of Hark & Hark. Clicking on such a result brought up the Hark & Hark website, Helmer Conley alleged.
Folkman filed the suit on behalf of Helmer Conley and principals Yaron Helmer and James Conley. Helmer Conley's website lists three partners, four associates and 42 lawyers who are of counsel. Besides Hark & Hark, firm principals Jeffrey Hark and Richard Hark were named as defendants in the suit.
Google generates the “sponsored links” section of its search results screens by charging fees to parties who want their websites to be associated with certain search terms. For example, a matrimonial attorney might pay to have his or her firm name appear at the top of a list of results generated when someone conducts a search on a term such as “divorce lawyer.” Then, each time an internet user clicks on a particular sponsored link, the sponsor of that link is charged a fee by Google.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litigators of the Week: A $630M Antitrust Settlement for Automotive Software Vendors—$140M More Than Alleged Overcharges
- 2Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 3Linklaters Hires Four Partners From Patterson Belknap
- 4Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise, Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
- 5Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250