Leonia Traffic Ordinance Voided in Court
A state judge has voided a local ordinance in Leonia that sought to bar non-residents from using certain roads as a rush hour traffic-reduction measure.
August 31, 2018 at 11:09 AM
3 minute read
A state judge has voided a local ordinance in Leonia that sought to bar non-residents from using certain roads as a rush hour traffic-reduction measure.
According to reports, Judge Peter Bariso of Hudson County Superior Court ruled Thursday that Leonia lacked authority to restrict access to certain streets that intersect with a state highway without permission from the state Department of Transportation. A portion of the roughly 60 streets covered by the ordinance intersect with Grand Avenue, also known as State Route 93.
Leonia designated dozens of its streets as residents-only in an attempt to deter drivers using local roads as a shortcut to the George Washington Bridge. In January, Leonia posted red signs warning nonresidents to stay off of roughly 60 secondary streets in the town, lest they face a $200 fine. The restrictions were in effect only at certain hours of the day. Residents of the town were issued yellow hanging tags for their cars, so police could differentiate between locals and outsiders.
But an attorney, Jacqueline Rosa, filed suit in January on her own behalf to overturn the ordinance. In March the Attorney General's office wrote to Leonia, declaring the ordinance invalid because it lacked approval from the state Department of Transportation. And the DOT joined the suit, Rosa v. Borough of Leonia, in June.
The 1.6-square-mile town enacted the measure to fight traffic that takes detours on local streets while on the way to the bridge, which is less than two miles away. Streets named in the ordinance were declared closed to outsiders, or those without a final destination in Leonia, from 6 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 9 pm. Leonia officials, in enacting the ordinance, said traffic navigation apps such as Waze were causing traffic congestion on secondary roads by directing drivers to seek shortcuts.
Bariso, in addition to declaring the ordinance invalid, ordered Leonia to take down signs restricting traffic on side streets and to notify Waze and other apps that restrictions on its secondary roads were no longer in effect, the reports said.
Leonia solicitor Brian Chewcaskie, of Gittleman, Muhlstock & Chewcaskie in Fort Lee, did not return a call about the ruling. But he is quoted in the reports as saying that Leonia would likely appeal he ruling, and would submit its ordinance for approval by the DOT. He also said the town would seek a stay allowing its signs to remain standing pending the appeal.
Rosa, who is with the Seigel Law Firm in Ridgewood, noted that her case accused the state of non-compliance with state regulations as well as violating the public's constitutional rights to travel freely, but the ruiling only dealt with the former. She said any appeal by Leonia would be a “complete waste of time.” She said when she first filed suit, she was focusing on her own rights as a commuter, but she came to see the case was “about everybody's rights to use these streets. I think if you're starting to mess with people's constitutional rights, it's a dangerous game.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBankruptcy Judge Clears Path for Recovery in High-Profile Crypto Failure
3 minute readGibbons Reps Asylum Seekers in $6M Suit Over 2018 ‘Inhumane’ Immigration Policy
3 minute readNJ Supreme Court Clarifies Affidavit of Merit Requirement for Doctor With Dual Specialties
4 minute readJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250