Business Dispute Among Family Members Leads to $5 Million Verdict in Ocean
In Uzzolino v. Mitrow, an Ocean County jury on June 20 awarded a bankruptcy trustee $5 million following a dispute involving the sale of a family-owned…
September 03, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
In Uzzolino v. Mitrow, an Ocean County jury on June 20 awarded a bankruptcy trustee $5 million following a dispute involving the sale of a family-owned pharmaceutical marketing company.
The dispute centered around Joseph Uzzolino's hidden interest in the marketing company, Access Communications, that he started with his cousin, Michael Mitrow, said Michele Dudas, the attorney for the bankruptcy trustee, Barry Sharer.
Uzzolino was a Teamsters union president. The partnership was formed based in large part on Uzzolino's ability to obtain membership lists for marketing interests, said Dudas, of Trenk, DiPasquale, Della Fera & Sodono in West Orange.
Although Uzzolino owned half of the company, all of the stock was in Mitrow's name when Access Communications was sold to a Cambridge, Massachusetts, private equity firm, Monitor Clipper Partners, for $72 million, Dudas said.
At the time, Mitrow was under criminal investigation, Dudas said, adding that Mitrow told Uzzolino that he had no ownership interest in Access.
Uzzolino claimed he never received a payment, since Mitrow was denied final payments from the sale because of the investigation, Dudas said.
A grand jury in the Southern District of New York indicted Mitrow in September 2013 on wire fraud and tax evasion charges. In January 2015, Mitrow pleaded guilty to conspiracy and tax fraud, and was sentenced to 42 months in prison, Dudas said.
Uzzolino filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief in January 2014. Dudas said he did not mention his ownership interest in Access.
During Mitrow's pre-sentence hearing, Uzzolino was a witness and said he learned for the first time about the details surrounding the sale of Access, and that he was still owed money from the proceeds, Dudas said.
Uzzolino filed his state court lawsuit in June 2015, alleging breach of oral contract, unjust enrichment and other claims.
In September 2016, Sharer reopened the bankruptcy and joined in the lawsuit, Dudas said.
Dudas said Sharer will search for Mitrow's assets and use the proceeds to pay off any creditors.
The jury unanimously awarded $5 million in damages, according to Dudas.
Uzzolino's personal attorney, Jackson solo Warren Peterson, said he is hoping that there will be money left over for Uzzolino after the bankruptcy creditors have been paid.
Superior Court Judge Craig Wellerson, who presided over the trial, added $363,116 in prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest to the award.
Mitrow's attorney, Eric Inglis of Schenck Price Smith & King in Florham Park, declined to comment.
— Michael Booth
$937,500 for Ambulance vs. Pedestrian
Best v. TriCare: An Atlantic City woman is to receive $937,500 as compensation for injuries she sustained when she was hit by an ambulance while crossing a street.
Plaintiff Marketa Best, now 45, is in the process of receiving her settlement funds from New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., the carrier for defendant TriCare Medical Transportation and its driver, Antowyan AIkens, said Best's attorneys, Michael Pender and Teddy Strickland Jr., of Targan & Pender in Atlantic City.
Best's lawsuit, filed in Atlantic County Superior Court, settled on May 17, shortly before it was scheduled to go to trial before Superior Court Judge Christine Smith, the attorneys said.
Best was injured on Nov. 16, 2015, at the intersection of Pacific and Tennessee avenues. A security camera filmed the accident: the ambulance was making a left turn from Tennessee onto Pacific, the lawyers said.
The accident occurred when Best bent over to pick up an item that fell out of her shopping cart, they said.
She sustained a broken right pelvis and right leg displacement, and a laceration to her left ankle, and underwent surgery and physical therapy, they said.
Because of the pelvic fracture and preexisting conditions, Best has been unable to walk since being struck preexisting medical conditions, she claimeed. She has been recommended for, but not yet received, a total hip replacement, they said
NJM retainerd Chad Moore of the Hammonton office of Hoagland Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas. He didn't return a call about the case.
— Michael Booth
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250