Jury Rejects NJ Attorney General's Religious Bias Case Against Elizabeth Landlord
Following a four-day trial, the jury acquitted William Greda on four counts of violating the Law Against Discrimination based on his alleged refusal to rent to an applicant who was wearing a Muslim head scarf.
September 04, 2018 at 02:32 PM
4 minute read
Jurors in Union County have rejected a suit lodged by the state Division on Civil Rights claiming that a landlord engaged in anti-Muslim bias in denying a renter's application.
Following a four-day trial, the jury acquitted William Greda on four counts of violating the Law Against Discrimination based on his alleged refusal to rent to an applicant who was wearing a khimar, which is a Muslim head scarf.
The Aug. 24 verdict came after Superior Court Judge Alan Lesnewich barred the jury from viewing footage from News 12 New Jersey that the state sought to admit into evidence. The footage showed Greda accusing the applicant, Fatima Farghaly, of being involved with ISIS and saying that she and the state were attempting to extort money from him.
The jury, however, did see a brief cellphone video made by Farghaly, in which she asks if he won't rent to her because she's a Muslim. Greda is seen answering her, “you don't ask me nothing. Would you go?”
Greda was charged with violating the LAD by refusing to rent an apartment at his 17-unit building in Elizabeth to Farghaly based in whole or in part on her religion by inquiring about it in connection with the rental of real property, and by making discriminatory statements based on religion and gender.
The suit also accused Greda of violating the state Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act by transferring ownership of the 17-unit apartment building to a limited liability company he controls for $1 in April 2016, after he learned of the division's legal action. The building, which was held in the names of Greda and his wife, was previously listed for sale for $2 million but is not now on the market, the state said.
The fraudulent-transfer count was severed from the LAD charges and was not heard by Lesnewich.
Farghaly complained to the Division on Civil Rights after Greda declined to rent to her in 2016. The state subsequently sent a female investigator wearing a Muslim head scarf to ask Greda about renting an apartment. Greda showed her a basement apartment but told her it was “not good for you” because, as a woman, she would have difficulty moving her belongings in case the apartment became flooded, the suit claimed.
Later the same day, the state sent another female investigator, this one not wearing a head scarf or presenting herself as a Muslim, the state said. This time, Greda made no mention of flooding or the apartment's suitability for a female tenant, the state said in its complaint.
Deputy Attorney General Megan Harris represented the state.
After the jury dismissed all four LAD counts against Greda, a spokesman for the Attorney General's Office, Lee Moore, said, “We respectfully disagree with the jury's verdict and are reviewing our legal options.”
Greda's attorney, Vincent Sanzone, said the judge's decision to bar jurors from viewing the News 12 footage was correct because the station did not make available an unedited version of its interview with the defendant, which he said ran 30 minutes. The televised version of the News 12 report was unfair and “took things out of context,” said Sanzone, of Elizabeth.
Sanzone said the jury found his client credible because Farghaly's story was inconsistent with that of a male co-worker who accompanied her on the visit to Greda's apartment building. Sanzone also said his client, who came to the U.S. from Poland in 1971, has difficulty expressing himself in English.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250