Mahwah Settles Suit Claiming Ordinances Targeted Orthodox Jewish Community
The township of Mahwah has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the state last year alleging that the Bergen County municipality adopted two discriminatory ordinances.
September 17, 2018 at 05:36 PM
3 minute read
The township of Mahwah has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the state last year alleging that the Bergen County municipality adopted two discriminatory ordinances: one that banned nonresidents from using the town's public parks, and the other that prohibited the posting of “lechis” on utility poles.
According to a statement released Monday by Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, Mahwah has repealed the two ordinances at issue in the original complaint and has agreed to refrain from adopting any future ordinances imposing similar restrictions. The settlement is still subject to final court review and approval, Grewal said.
Mahwah agreed to a suspended payment to the state of $350,000, a liability that will be vacated within four years if the township complies with the settlement's terms, Grewal said.
During that period, the township must provide the state Division on Civil Rights with at least 30 days' advance notice of any vote on a proposed ordinance affecting public access to parks and recreational facilities, the settlement provides. The same notice would be required for any ordinance concerning placement of “signs, devices or any material whatsoever” on utility poles, Grewal said.
The township also agreed to investigate criminally incidents of damage to lechis placed on utility poles unless there is good cause to believe the damages is weather-related or accidental.
Lechis are plastic strips placed on utility poles that denote the boundaries of an “eruv,” a geographic area through which Orthodox Jews may move while still observing the Sabbath's movement restrictions.
The township's attorney, Brian Chewkaski of Fort Lee's Gittleman, Muhlstock & Chewkaski, was away from his office and could not be reached.
The October 2017 lawsuit alleged that the township enacted the ordinances with the intent of staving off a perceived influx of Orthodox Jews.
Then-Attorney General Christopher Porrino at the time likened the conduct of Mahwah's elected officials to those of 1950s “white flight” suburbanites who sought to keep African-Americans out of their towns. “In addition to being on the wrong side of history, the conduct of Mahwah's township council is legally wrong, and we intend to hold them accountable for it,” Porrino said.
According to media reports at the time, local council meetings had turned raucous as local residents complained about an influx of Orthodox Jewish citizens from adjacent Rockland County, New York. The complaint, filed in Bergen County, alleged that many of the public comments offered during meetings were “overtly anti-Semitic” in nature, and that around the same time, Mahwah police began receiving “multiple calls” from residents reporting that people who appeared to be Orthodox Jews were using the parks, although the callers did not allege any problematic conduct.
The complaint alleged the Mahwah township council's actions violated the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Nonprofits Plead for Answers, Dem AGs Plan Suit to Block Trump Funding Freeze
3 minute readMenendez Asks US Judge for Bond Pending Appeal of Criminal Conviction
NJ Jury Awards $8M to Woman Injured by Employees Chasing Suspected Shoplifter
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250