Mahwah Settles Suit Claiming Ordinances Targeted Orthodox Jewish Community
The township of Mahwah has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the state last year alleging that the Bergen County municipality adopted two discriminatory ordinances.
September 17, 2018 at 05:36 PM
3 minute read
The township of Mahwah has agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by the state last year alleging that the Bergen County municipality adopted two discriminatory ordinances: one that banned nonresidents from using the town's public parks, and the other that prohibited the posting of “lechis” on utility poles.
According to a statement released Monday by Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, Mahwah has repealed the two ordinances at issue in the original complaint and has agreed to refrain from adopting any future ordinances imposing similar restrictions. The settlement is still subject to final court review and approval, Grewal said.
Mahwah agreed to a suspended payment to the state of $350,000, a liability that will be vacated within four years if the township complies with the settlement's terms, Grewal said.
During that period, the township must provide the state Division on Civil Rights with at least 30 days' advance notice of any vote on a proposed ordinance affecting public access to parks and recreational facilities, the settlement provides. The same notice would be required for any ordinance concerning placement of “signs, devices or any material whatsoever” on utility poles, Grewal said.
The township also agreed to investigate criminally incidents of damage to lechis placed on utility poles unless there is good cause to believe the damages is weather-related or accidental.
Lechis are plastic strips placed on utility poles that denote the boundaries of an “eruv,” a geographic area through which Orthodox Jews may move while still observing the Sabbath's movement restrictions.
The township's attorney, Brian Chewkaski of Fort Lee's Gittleman, Muhlstock & Chewkaski, was away from his office and could not be reached.
The October 2017 lawsuit alleged that the township enacted the ordinances with the intent of staving off a perceived influx of Orthodox Jews.
Then-Attorney General Christopher Porrino at the time likened the conduct of Mahwah's elected officials to those of 1950s “white flight” suburbanites who sought to keep African-Americans out of their towns. “In addition to being on the wrong side of history, the conduct of Mahwah's township council is legally wrong, and we intend to hold them accountable for it,” Porrino said.
According to media reports at the time, local council meetings had turned raucous as local residents complained about an influx of Orthodox Jewish citizens from adjacent Rockland County, New York. The complaint, filed in Bergen County, alleged that many of the public comments offered during meetings were “overtly anti-Semitic” in nature, and that around the same time, Mahwah police began receiving “multiple calls” from residents reporting that people who appeared to be Orthodox Jews were using the parks, although the callers did not allege any problematic conduct.
The complaint alleged the Mahwah township council's actions violated the First, Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConstruction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250