Morris County, Churches Ask US Supreme Court to Take Up Preservation Grants Case
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in April that awarding historic preservation grants to the churches violated the state constitution.
September 19, 2018 at 05:19 PM
3 minute read
Morris County is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by New Jersey's high court that said the award of $4.6 million in taxpayer funds for historic preservation of churches violated the Religious Aid Clause of the state constitution.
The petition for a writ of certiorari was filed Tuesday on behalf of the county and a group of churches by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a Washington, D.C.-based group that advocates for the rights of religious institutions.
The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in April that awarding the historic preservation grants to the churches violated the state constitution, holding that the recipients “are not being denied grant funds because they are religious institutions; they are being denied public funds because of what they plan to do—and in many cases have done: use public funds to repair church buildings so that religious worship services can be held there.”
Becket was an amicus before the state Supreme Court.
In the petition, Becket argues that the funds were necessary to preserve the historic nature of the churches, some of which were built during the 1700s and are showing the results of historic decay.
“Time takes its toll on all things—including historic places of worship,” Becket's lead attorney, Eric Baxter, wrote in the petition. “Accounting for this melancholy truth, federal, state, and local governments have long allocated funds for the preservation of historic sites, secular and religious alike.”
He added, “This effort has the noble purpose of maintaining connections to the past, honoring history's most striking achievements, and preserving the character and beauty of our nation's diverse communities.”
Baxter noted that lower courts have split on the issue of whether public funds can be used for historic preservation of religious facilities, and urged the Supreme Court to resolve the issue.
The lawsuit challenging the Morris County grants was filed by the Freedom From Religion Foundation.
Its lead attorney, Andrew Seidel, could not be reached for comment on the petition.
According to the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision in the case, between 2012 and 2015, about $4.6 million of the Morris County freeholders' $11.1 million in historic preservation grants went to 12 churches. The recipient properties had to be registered on the national and New Jersey registers of historic places, among other qualifications, and several recipients noted on their applications that the funds would be used to renovate houses of worship used for services, according to the court.
In late 2015 the Freedom From Religion Foundation, and David Steketee, a member of the organization and resident of Morris County, sued the freeholder board and other Morris County parties. The organization relied on the New Jersey Constitution's Religious Aide Clause, which provides that citizens can't be required ”to pay tithes, taxes, or other rates for building or repairing any church or churches, place or places of worship, or for the maintenance of any minister or ministry[.]”
The freeholders removed the case to federal court, but U.S. District Judge John Vazquez in 2016 remanded it. The county's motion for summary judgment was granted by Somerset County Superior Court Judge Margaret Goodzeit, who held that the county was not barred from awarding grants to churches. The Supreme Court took up the case directly from Goodzeit, and reversed her holding.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Division Tosses Challenge to Rutgers Board Members That Ensnared NJ Lawyer
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Einhorn Barbarito; Hartmann Doherty; Lowenstein Sandler; Lindabury McCormick
5 minute read'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 2Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 3CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 4Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 5Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250