Among NJ Top 40 Law Firms, Revenue Growth More Common Than Population Growth
More large New Jersey law offices are growing revenue than are growing attorney population, the Law Journal's annual Top 40 survey has found.
September 21, 2018 at 02:40 PM
5 minute read
Bigstock
More large New Jersey law offices are growing revenue than are growing attorney population, the Law Journal's annual Top 40 survey has found.
Year over year, half of the 40 firms (ordered by fiscal 2017 gross earnings derived from their New Jersey offices) increased revenue, while 16 were down, and four were essentially flat.
Meanwhile, only 13 firms increased attorney head count in New Jersey last fiscal year. Most firms (15) were flat—meaning they had a year-over-year attorney population change of one or none. The remaining 12 firms had a net loss of two or more attorneys in New Jersey, according to the data.
Financially, it's a somewhat less rosy picture than last year's survey, which found that more firms (27) had year-over-year revenue increases in New Jersey.
In fiscal 2017, some firms increased New Jersey revenue by building their lawyer ranks, but as usual, earnings on an individual basis often tell the tale. Simply put, there's a reason why many who work with and observe law firm financial metrics consider revenue per lawyer (RPL) to be a key indicator of firm performance.
There are a few good examples in New Jersey.
Brach Eichler's gross revenue jump in fiscal 2017 came with no real change in the lawyer population. The firm improved its RPL by 4.8 percent—to $566,000 from $540,000.
Managing partner John Fanburg credited a better billing realization rate for the gain, as well as several practices he said have performed well: litigation, personal injury, corporate tax, health care and real estate.
Duane Morris' New Jersey offices fared similarly well. The firm's lawyer population in the state (36) was unchanged in fiscal 2017, though RPL improved 4.3 percent, to $722,000 from $697,000. That led to a 6 percent spike in the Philadelphia-based firm's New Jersey revenue, to $26.5 million.
McCarter & English had a net decrease of four lawyers in New Jersey, to 164, but grew its RPL 8.8 percent, to $702,000, helping yield a 6.5 percent year-over-year bump in New Jersey revenue, to $115.3 million.
Even with the population decrease, McCarter maintains the second-highest population of lawyers in New Jersey, behind McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, which has 170 lawyers in the state.
A few other firms owe their gross revenue bumps to a combination of population growth and holding steady or improving incrementally on RPL.
At Connell Foley, for example, a net gain of two attorneys in New Jersey and a healthy-if-not-huge increase in RPL (by 2.3 percent, to $442,000) meant a 4 percent increase in New Jersey gross, to $51.7 million.
Lowenstein Sandler was something of a unique case. Though it had significantly fewer New Jersey lawyers in fiscal 2017, the firm improved its RPL markedly, and crossed the $1 million mark in the process. Its $1.01 million RPL figure is an 8.2 percent increase over the prior year's $934,000.
Scarinci Hollenbeck had a net gain of five lawyers in New Jersey, to 62, though the Lyndhurst-based firm's RPL decreased 2.3 percent, to $432,000. The net effect is a 6.3 percent increase in New Jersey gross revenue, to $26.8 million.
Managing partner Donald Scarinci said he's not satisfied with the firm's financial performance but credited the environmental, land use, commercial development and intellectual property practices for gains made.
He added that the firm's attorney population growth has been largely organic, with little lateral addition.
“The cost of providing legal services keeps rising, but the fees for those services do[] not,” Scarinci said in an email. “The market continues to be more and more price competitive. … Law firms must think outside of the box in every area, spend time on pricing legal services properly, and focus on quality of life to attract talent.”
Census
Fifteen of the 40 firms (37.5 percent) had a New Jersey population in fiscal 2017 that was actually or essentially flat, though there were some notable population swings among the group.
Some offices grew. Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas had a net gain of 16 lawyers in New Jersey, increasing to 104 total. Porzio, Bromberg & Newman gained nine lawyers, increasing to 70 total. And Schenck, Price, Smith & King gained seven lawyers, increasing to 83 total.
Other offices became smaller. Lowenstein Sandler had a net decrease of 16 lawyers in New Jersey, to 139 total. Three firms had a net decrease of seven lawyers: Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti (to 134 total), Budd Larner (to 64) and Norris McLaughlin (to 63).
Fanburg said Brach Eichler tries to “hold the line” on attorney population, but is even more careful about staff.
“You can justify hiring a lawyer because you're going to make more money,” he said.
But, “not only do you work to bring in more work, but you've got to manage overhead,” he added. “I've seen law firms really forget about the overhead factor and bring in too many people who don't generate income.”
As for legal work profit margins, firms may be increasingly sensitive to them, but, “no one in this economy is going to turn work away,” Fanburg said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Chief Counsel to Gov. Murphy Set to Move to Lowenstein Sandler Chief Counsel to Gov. Murphy Set to Move to Lowenstein Sandler](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/10/Parimal-Garg-767x633.jpg)
![Election Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In Election Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2024/10/Georgia-Early-Voting-11-767x633.jpg)
Election Law Spending Is on the Rise, but Big Firms Have Reasons Not to Cash In
6 minute read![Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/09/Troutman-Sanders-Sign-06-767x633-1.jpg)
Troutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Recent Controversial Decision and Insurance Law May Mitigate Exposure for Companies Subject to False Claims Act Lawsuits
- 2Visa Revocation and Removal: Can the New Administration Remove Foreign Nationals for Past Advocacy?
- 3Your Communications Are Not Secure! What Legal Professionals Need to Know
- 4Legal Leaders Need To Create A High-Trust Culture
- 5There's a New Chief Judge in Town: Meet the Top Miami Jurist
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250