Judge Removed From Bench for Meddling in Custody Case, Lying During Investigation
The New Jersey Supreme Court removed Passaic County Superior Court Judge Liliana DeAvila-Silebi.
September 26, 2018 at 04:19 PM
4 minute read
The New Jersey Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered that a judge charged with improperly intervening in a child custody matter, and then fabricating a story about the incident, be immediately removed from office.
The court, in an order signed by Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, removed Passaic County Superior Court Judge Liliana DeAvila-Silebi and referred the matter for further review to the Office of Attorney Ethics.
DeAvila-Silebi, who has been suspended without pay, had previously waived her right to defend herself against the claims.
Her attorney, Jersey City solo Peter Willis, didn't provide a comment by press time, and attempts to reach DeAvila-Silebi directly were unsuccessful.
The state Attorney General's Office, which represented the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct before the court, declined to comment.
The court's order follows the recommendation of a special panel of the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, which determined that she should be removed from the bench. The panel pointed to her dishonesty in the wake of the incident as grounds for removal.
“In light of the panel's finding beyond a reasonable doubt that there is cause of respondent's removal … respondent's continued suspension from the performance of her judicial duties shall be without pay,” said a June 2018 order signed by Rabner.
The special panel reviewed the case after the ACJC issued a presentment recommending DeAvila-Silebi's removal.
In the report, the special panel—Appellate Division Judge Carmen Messano, Camden County Superior Court Judge Deborah Silverman-Katz and Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Lisa Thornton—said: ”In this case, [respondent's] conduct … demonstrated dishonesty, perversion of her judicial authority and betrayal of the public trust.”
“We are compelled to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent's … deceitful conduct justifies her removal from office,” the panel said.
DeAvila-Silebi was charged with violating the judicial code of conduct by calling the police on a weekend and having a child transferred from one parent to another, and by her conduct in the investigation that followed.
According to documents, the incident, in which DeAvila-Silebi allegedly assisted in having a child moved from the custody of the mother, occurred on May 9, 2015. DeAvila-Silebi called the Fort Lee Police Department and after explaining she was assigned to both Bergen and Passaic counties and was on emergent duty, arranged for the police to pick up the child. DeAvila-Silebi later told authorities she received a call on her cellphone from someone purporting to be an attorney detailing a court order related to a child custody agreement, but that the call turned out to come from an unidentified male using a phone belonging to the mother of the child, documents said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will England Accept that Digital Assets Are ‘Property’?
- 2Congress and Courts Are Considering Litigation Financing: Is Disclosure Imminent?
- 3Bar Report — Nov. 25, 2024
- 4People in the News—Nov. 25, 2024—Eckert Seamans, Klehr Harrison
- 5How We Made Practice Group Chair: 'One of the Most Important Skills Is Being a Good Listener,' Say Timothy Kincaid and Brad Vaiana of Winston & Strawn
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250