Plaintiffs Drop SDNY Suit Opposing Rider University's Sale of Choir College
The plaintiffs sought to have the sale declared illegal, claiming it violated the terms of the merger agreement between Rider and Westminster.
October 03, 2018 at 03:37 PM
3 minute read
Opponents of Rider University's $40 million deal to sell Westminster Choir College to a Chinese company have voluntarily dismissed their New York lawsuit over the sale.
U.S. District Judge Ronnie Abrams, in the Southern District of New York, granted the plaintiffs' motion for voluntary dismissal on Oct. 2 in McMorris v. Rider University. The plaintiffs in that case, a group of Westminster alumni, parents and students, conceded the proper venue for the suit is Mercer County Superior Court, Chancery Division, where Princeton Theological Seminary v. Rider University is pending.
Abrams said the dismissal would be with prejudice unless the McMorris plaintiffs can provide an explanation by Oct. 9 on how their claims remain viable in light of assertions by Rider that they lack contractual standing to sue for breach of a 1991 merger agreement, have not identified any statements that would give rise to liability for breach of an implied contract or fraudulent inducement, and have not alleged any harm that is cognizable under Sections 349 and 350 of the New York Deceptive Business Practices Act.
The plaintiffs sought to have the sale declared illegal, claiming it violated the terms of the merger agreement between Rider and Westminster. It also claimed that allowing Rider to profit from the sale of Westminster would violate public policy.
But the McMorris plaintiffs now believe the Chancery Division is the proper venue for the dispute because the Chinese buyer of Westminster, Bejing Kaiwen Education Technology Co. Ltd., and its acquisition division, Westminster Choir College Acquisition Corp., are named as defendants in that case, plaintiffs attorney Bruce Afran said in a letter to Abrams Oct. 2. The New York court has no jurisdiction over those entities because they do not conduct any business in New York, Afran said in court papers.
“Plaintiffs believe that the gravamen of the action rests on these cy pres and related grounds now being litigated in the Chancery Division action,” Afran said.
Westminster Choir College has about 500 students at its 23-acre campus in Princeton, where it has operated since 1934. It merged with Rider in 1992, which is located seven miles away in Lawrenceville.
Rider announced in 2017 that it intended to sever the relationship and would seek a new partner. In June, Rider announced the $40 million deal to transfer the school to Kaiwen, which has agreed to continue to operate Westminster at the Princeton location for at least 10 years.
In the Chancery Division suit, Princeton Theological Seminary, an institution located about a mile from Westminster's campus, claims the sale of Westminster's campus would violate the terms of the trust established by Sophia Strong Taylor, who donated the land for the Westminster campus in the 1930s. The seminary's suit says it should receive the land because Taylor specified its ownership should revert to the seminary if Westminster failed to comply with terms of the donation.
Afran and Rider's lawyer in the case, Angelo Stio of Pepper Hamilton in Princeton, did not return calls requesting comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
7 minute readConstruction Worker Hit by Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute readEagle Pharma Founder Sues Company to Recoup Cost of SEC Investigation
2 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 2How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 3On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 4Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
- 5'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250