Lawyer's Decadelong Cover-Up of Case Dismissal Fuels Battle With Firm's Malpractice Carrier
Eichen Crutchlow sued Allied World Insurance Co. after it refused to cover a potential malpractice suit against former attorney Edward McElroy.
October 05, 2018 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
New Jersey law firm Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow is battling in court with its malpractice insurance carrier over coverage for a lawyer's decadelong cover-up of a botched case.
Eichen Crutchlow sued Allied World Insurance Co. after it refused to cover a potential malpractice suit against former attorney Edward McElroy. The firm sued Allied World in Middlesex County Superior Court on Aug. 28, and the insurance company removed the case to federal court on Oct. 4. The suit seeks a declaratory judgment that Eichen Crutchlow is entitled to a defense and indemnification under the policy for a claim against McElroy by a former client, Dennis Bielski.
On July 18, Middletown attorney Michael Hanus gave Eichen Crutchlow notice that he was representing Bielski and intended to sue the firm for damages based on McElroy's handling of Bielski's previous slip-and-fall case. The firm forwarded the letter to Allied World, which replied on July 30 that it would withhold coverage and defense of the firm, according to Eichen Crutchlow's suit. The firm protested that decision, but Allied World stuck to its guns, according to the complaint, which did not say why the insurance company withheld coverage.
The conflict has its origin in 2002, when Bielski retained McElroy to represent him in a slip-and-fall case against the operator of a truck terminal. The suit was dismissed in August 2007 after Bielski failed to show up for a medical exam arranged by the defendant. Although Bielski eventually appeared for the exam, a judge denied McElroy's motion to reinstate the case. The complaint says McElroy brought an appeal, but it was dismissed in April 2008 after the attorney “failed to perfect” it, the suit claims.
McElroy failed to notify his firm that the appeal was dismissed, and apparently failed to notify his client as well, according to the Eichen Crutchlow lawsuit.
McElroy then proceeded to misrepresent to Bielski for approximately 10 years that the case was still active, and never told his firm colleagues about the communications with Bielski, the suit claims.
In 2017, Bielski apparently came to believe McElroy was not telling him the truth about the status of the case, and announced he was planning to hire another attorney to handle the case. McElroy then told Bielski the case had settled for $800,000, and eventually gave Bielski a check for $425,000. McElroy said that payment represented the client's share of the settlement, less attorney fees and costs, but the funds came from McElroy's own bank account, the suit said.
Bielski, who signed settlement documents drawn up by McElroy when he accepted the $425,000, soon realized the documents were fake, and contacted Eichen Crutchlow, Hanus said.
Eichen Crutchlow has nine attorneys listed on its website, and focuses on personal injury law. At some point, the firm was known as Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow & McElroy.
Eichen Crutchlow first learned in or around January of “McElroy's numerous and various acts of alleged professional negligence and the fact that he, beyond the scope of his authority, failed to disclose these events to the Firm,” the lawsuit said.
Hanus said Eichen Crutchlow fired McElroy and reported him to state ethics authorities when it learned of his actions in the Bielski case.
No malpractice suit has been filed so far, Hanus said. Hanus said McElroy's handling of the Bielski case appears to be an “isolated incident” and that Eichen Crutchlow has acted “honorably and equitably” toward his client.
Donald Ottaunick of Cole Schotz in Hackensack, who represents Eichen Crutchlow in the insurance case, declined to answer questions about the case. McElroy could not be located. Gerald Ford of Landman Corsi Ballaine & Ford in Newark, who represents Allied World, did not return a call for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readHit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
Appellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Texas Shows the Way Forward in Resolving Mass Tort Gridlock
- 2Ninth Circuit Rules on Inherent Authority and FRCP 37(e)
- 3Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
- 4Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
- 5People in the News—Dec. 2, 2024—Marshall Dennehey, Pollock Begg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250