BAR REPORT - Capitol Report - NJSBA weighs in on proposed Court Rule amendments
Municipal courts; electronic filing; Complex Business Litigation Program
October 08, 2018 at 08:00 AM
3 minute read
This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointments of interest to lawyers, as well as the involvement of the NJSBA as amicus in appellate court matters. To learn more, visit njsba.com.
|Municipal Court Operations, Fines and Fees
The NJSBA offered a number of comments to the Supreme Court on its Report of the Supreme Court Committee on Municipal Court Operations, Fines and Fees. It lauded the Supreme Court for addressing the issue in light of the association's own Report on Judicial Independence in the Municipal Courts last year, specifically the fact that the Supreme Court incorporated many of the association's own recommendations. It offered additional comments, including recommendations to:
- Explore alternatives to incarceration in addition to alternatives to license suspension.
- Extend a proposed policy limiting the issuance of bench warrants to matters where outstanding fines or fees owed by a defendant exceed $250 to include cases with consequences of magnitude.
- Establish a goal of operating municipal courts in a paperless fashion, including sending electronic notices to defendants, to enhance the aim of centralizing and modernizing municipal court notice generation and printing to improve the quality and functionality of notice processing and to take advantage of high-volume printing and postage discounts.
- Develop an appeal process within the municipal court judge appointment procedure through which a candidate can appeal a decision of the Qualifications Committee and address whether a candidate who is found unqualified initially can be resubmitted after a period of time.
Electronic Filing of Papers
The New Jersey State Bar Association supports the proposed changes to Rule 1:4-9 to clarify the requirement that only one side of the paper be used and that recycled paper be used, provided legibility is maintained. The proposed amendment also calls for all electronically filed documents to be appropriately rotated and not be submitted in an incorrect orientation such as upside down, sideways or backwards.
The association recommended that language be added to permit an opportunity to resubmit any document that is not appropriately rotated without the need for a formal amendatory filing or additional fees.
|Complex Business Litigation Program Proposed Guidelines
The association supported the majority of the proposed recommendations to the Complex Business Litigation Program, with one exception regarding the Model Joint Discovery Plan. The plan calls for the inclusion of information in connection with settlement discussions, specifically the submission of the amount of the plaintiff's last demand and the defendant's last offer. The NJSBA pointed out that this information is usually confidential until an agreement is reached, even to the extent that it is not typically shared with the judge overseeing the matter.
A recommendation was made to revise paragraph three of the Model Joint Discovery Plan to seek only information about whether settlement negotiations have taken place, but not to include any details about these negotiations.
The association supported all of the other proposals, including the proposed overview and case management guidelines, scheduling order, electronic discovery stipulation and order, and clawback stipulation and order.
For a full copy of the comments by the NJSBA, go to njsba.com.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOn the Move and After Hours: Fisher Phillips; Cohn Lifland; Porzio Bromberg; GSBA
7 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Greenberg Traurig; Helmer Conley; Greenbaum Rowe; Trenk Isabel; Federal Bar of NJ
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250