Woman Settles Sex Abuse Claims With School Board, Bus Company and Driver for $1.25M in Morris Co.
In a Morris County suit, Bishop v. Comperchio, a Sparta woman will receive $1.25 million as compensation for physical and emotional injuries she sustained…
October 08, 2018 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
Credit: Rrraum/Shutterstock.com
In a Morris County suit, Bishop v. Comperchio, a Sparta woman will receive $1.25 million as compensation for physical and emotional injuries she sustained when she was sexually molested by a school bus driver.
Plaintiff Kristen Bishop, now 21, of Sparta, agreed to the settlement with the defendants—Mount Arlington Board of Education, Byrum Bus Lines Inc., and its driver, Edward Comperchio—on Sept. 4, said her lead attorney, Gregg Stone.
The settlement was approved by Morris County Superior Court Judge David Ironson, shortly before the case was scheduled to go to trial, said Stone, of Newark's Kirsch, Gelband & Stone.
Comperchio is now 78 and lives in Hopatcong, Stone said.
Comperchio, who was uninsured, agreed to pay $1 million, said Stone, who was assisted by Ronald Morgan of the Kirsch Gelband firm and Howard Myerowitz, a solo in Harrison. The Great American Insurance Co., the carrier for the Mount Arlington School District, where Bishop was a student, agreed to pay $250,000, Stone said.
Nationwide Insurance Co., the carrier for Comperchio's employer, Byrum, agreed to pay an additional amount that was subject to a confidentiality agreement, Stone said.
The lawsuit, filed when Bishop was 17, alleged Comperchio molested her on several occasions between 2006 and 2009, when she was in grades 3 through 6. The lawsuit alleged that Comperchio would arrive at her bus stop early and drive to a nearby parking lot, where he molested her before he would then pick up the other children on his route.
The lawsuit alleged that Byrum's buses were equipped with video surveillance cameras, but that Comperchio, in violation of school district regulations, did not activate the cameras before picking up Bishop, Stone said.
According to news reports, Comperchio eventually pleaded guilty to a single charge of unlawful contact with a child and was sentenced to probation.
Great American retained Patrick Clare of Clare & Scott in Liberty Corner to represent the school district. He confirmed the amount of the settlement.
Nationwide retained Michael Marone of Morristown's McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter to represent Byrum.
Comperchio was represented by Gerard Hanlon of Hanlon Dunn Robertson Schwartz in Morristown.
Marone and Hanlon didn't return calls seeking comment.
Stone said his firm currently is conducting an audit of Comperchio's assets to determine what may be subject to seizure to secure the judgment against him.
— Michael Booth
$1.15M for Delayed Diagnosis
Meredith v. Mapow: A Cumberland County medical malpractice suit, claiming failure to diagnose cancer, settled on July 23 for a total of $1.15 million.
In March 2012, Rhonda Meredith, then 47, underwent a hysterectomy at Inspira Medical Center in Vineland, after which tissue from the procedure was examined by Dr. Larry Mapow, a pathologist, according to Meredith's lawyers, Susan Connors and Bruce Nagel of Nagel Rice in Roseland.
The procedure was to remove painful fibroids. Mapow identified leiomyomata, a benign type of tumor, on the slides, but after the procedure, Meredith experienced worsening pain and in 2015 was diagnosed with a left lung tumor, and stage 4 metastatic leiomyosarcoma was diagnosed, Connors said.
The suit claimed that Mapow deviated from the standard of care in misdiagnosing the slides, which the suit said were suggestive of the malignant condition.
Meredith underwent chemotherapy and surgeries, though cancer has spread to the pancreas, her life expectancy is less than five years, Connors said.
The suit claimed that Meredith's condition would have been more treatable, with up to a 65 percent chance of survival, if discovered in 2012.
Inspira disputed the relationship between it and Mapow's medical group, which had a contract with the hospital, according to Connors. Mapow contended that the 2012 sample offered only a borderline indication of malignancy, and that he performed within the standard of care. Mapow also contended that the cancer, even if discovered in 2012, is an aggressive form of cancer and would not necessarily have been more treatable at that time, she said.
The parties settled after discussions with Superior Court Judge James Swift on the scheduled trial date of July 23.
Paul Schaaff of Orlovsky, Moody, Schaaff & Conlon in West Long Branch reprsented Mapow. Michael Halpin of Grossman Heavey & Halpin in Brick, represented Inspira. Neither returned a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies The 'Substantial Certainty' of Employer Liability Policies](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/b8/0b/d1952f014e508ba5d5b58cdc2958/injuried-worker2-767x633.jpg)
!['A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments 'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/399/2024/01/Justices-Douglas-Fasciale-767x633.jpg)
'A More Nuanced Issue': NJ Supreme Court Considers Appellate Rules for Personal Injury Judgments
5 minute read![Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/njlawjournal/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2022/10/Fraud-Investigation-767x633.jpg)
Appellate Division Rejects Third Circuit Interpretation of NJ Law, Says No Arbitration for Insurance Fraud
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250