Nineteen Heads
OP-ED: Statistically speaking, what are the odds of becoming a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court?
October 11, 2018 at 02:00 PM
5 minute read
One million people enter a coin-flipping contest. The winner becomes a Supreme Court Justice. Everyone flips at once, and you live to flip again if your coin lands on heads. Statistically, it will take about 20 flips to crown our champion. That is because the odds of flipping a coin 20 times and landing on heads each time is one in a million.
Of course, lower probability outcomes would be possible. So 20 flips is just a statistical average, not the number that it will take every time. Because we are using the contest (and its math) as a metaphor, let's just go with 20 flips.
It would be a strange way to pick Supreme Court Justices (but see William F. Buckley, who was fond of saying that he'd rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the Boston phone book than 2,000 Harvard professors), but it is not terribly different from what actually happens, given the long odds facing anyone who aspires to our highest court.
To begin with, no one has a realistic chance of becoming a Supreme Court Justice without being born with whatever innate gifts are necessary to permit extraordinary academic achievement later in life. Okay, science has not yet wrestled down what those things are. At present, the assumption is that intelligence is the product of some combination of nature and nurture. But no thoughtful person believes any longer that it is all nurture. So how many heads do you allocate to the gratuitous good fortune of being born with a brain that one day will allow you, not just to get into Yale Law School, but to be a star there, to be at or near the very top of the class? I'm going with eight.
And of course, you cannot just be brilliant. You have to be capable of working hard. We all know extremely bright people who prefer video games to reading Virgil in the original Latin. It truly does not matter how smart you are, you will not make it to the top unless you can put that intelligence to good use, and that means hard work. Maybe the ability to work hard is more nurture than nature. Whatever it is, it is still damn lucky. I give it two heads.
It is well known that high intelligence is correlated with mental illness. Brilliant people suffer from depression and other mental health disorders at rates higher than the population at large, which can derail a promising career at any point in its trajectory. In the modern era, it is not even necessary that the disorder inhibit performance to be disqualifying. Just the fact that one has been treated for such things can be enough (see Edmund Muskie, Thomas Eagleton). For the contrary proposition, people often point to the fact that Abraham Lincoln probably had a major depressive disorder. If he were alive today he would have been hospitalized a time or two and would be on stabilizing meds. Thus would the country be deprived of perhaps its greatest President. The sheer luck of not facing a disqualifying mental illness during one's life is worth, in my opinion, two more heads.
To be a serious contender for the Supreme Court, you must come to the notice of important people who will promote your career at propitious moments. This cannot happen only once. You must be noticed, and passed up the chain, a number of times. Yale Law School will have 10 students at the time of your graduation who are as academically talented as you are. Not all of them will get Supreme Court clerkships. Some professor of consequence must whisper in an ear for you. Then political heavy weights must do likewise several times during your post-clerkship career until you make the list of serious contenders from which the President will choose at the appropriate moment. This means that you are that rare bird who is both shockingly brilliant and so personable/attractive/connected that powerful people will want to see you promoted, typically beyond the hopes and aspirations that they harbor for themselves. The magnitude of this bit of luck is second only to your innate cognitive potential. I give it four heads.
And once you make that list, you will compete with 20 other people who have landed 16 heads. In order to be picked, you must match some profile that the specific moment requires. That profile changes moment by moment, as the political winds swirl and presidential advisors debate what they need: a member of a specific demographic group, a person identified with a cause near and dear to the political base. On top of that, you will not be on the list long. They like young people who will serve for decades. The next administration will have its own list. You are on the list for one presidency, probably not that long. You must be on the list when there is an opening and catch a fickle wind just right to be selected. Three more heads.
Nineteen heads. One more coin to flip. The Senate must approve you, but the political party of the President who picked you is in control. You are at 29,024 feet. To take your place among the 113 others who have scaled that mountain since the founding of the Republic, you need only reach up and touch the summit. Immortality. You are handed the coin.…
Samuel J. Samaro is a partner with Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Hackensack.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Justices Provide A Sensible Decision on the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act
4 minute readControversial Ethics Proceedings Against Mercer Judge Was Overreach. Stopping It Was the Right Thing to Do
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250