Nineteen Heads
OP-ED: Statistically speaking, what are the odds of becoming a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court?
October 11, 2018 at 02:00 PM
5 minute read
Credit: DNY59/iStockphoto.com.
One million people enter a coin-flipping contest. The winner becomes a Supreme Court Justice. Everyone flips at once, and you live to flip again if your coin lands on heads. Statistically, it will take about 20 flips to crown our champion. That is because the odds of flipping a coin 20 times and landing on heads each time is one in a million.
Of course, lower probability outcomes would be possible. So 20 flips is just a statistical average, not the number that it will take every time. Because we are using the contest (and its math) as a metaphor, let's just go with 20 flips.
It would be a strange way to pick Supreme Court Justices (but see William F. Buckley, who was fond of saying that he'd rather be governed by the first 2,000 people in the Boston phone book than 2,000 Harvard professors), but it is not terribly different from what actually happens, given the long odds facing anyone who aspires to our highest court.
To begin with, no one has a realistic chance of becoming a Supreme Court Justice without being born with whatever innate gifts are necessary to permit extraordinary academic achievement later in life. Okay, science has not yet wrestled down what those things are. At present, the assumption is that intelligence is the product of some combination of nature and nurture. But no thoughtful person believes any longer that it is all nurture. So how many heads do you allocate to the gratuitous good fortune of being born with a brain that one day will allow you, not just to get into Yale Law School, but to be a star there, to be at or near the very top of the class? I'm going with eight.
And of course, you cannot just be brilliant. You have to be capable of working hard. We all know extremely bright people who prefer video games to reading Virgil in the original Latin. It truly does not matter how smart you are, you will not make it to the top unless you can put that intelligence to good use, and that means hard work. Maybe the ability to work hard is more nurture than nature. Whatever it is, it is still damn lucky. I give it two heads.
It is well known that high intelligence is correlated with mental illness. Brilliant people suffer from depression and other mental health disorders at rates higher than the population at large, which can derail a promising career at any point in its trajectory. In the modern era, it is not even necessary that the disorder inhibit performance to be disqualifying. Just the fact that one has been treated for such things can be enough (see Edmund Muskie, Thomas Eagleton). For the contrary proposition, people often point to the fact that Abraham Lincoln probably had a major depressive disorder. If he were alive today he would have been hospitalized a time or two and would be on stabilizing meds. Thus would the country be deprived of perhaps its greatest President. The sheer luck of not facing a disqualifying mental illness during one's life is worth, in my opinion, two more heads.
To be a serious contender for the Supreme Court, you must come to the notice of important people who will promote your career at propitious moments. This cannot happen only once. You must be noticed, and passed up the chain, a number of times. Yale Law School will have 10 students at the time of your graduation who are as academically talented as you are. Not all of them will get Supreme Court clerkships. Some professor of consequence must whisper in an ear for you. Then political heavy weights must do likewise several times during your post-clerkship career until you make the list of serious contenders from which the President will choose at the appropriate moment. This means that you are that rare bird who is both shockingly brilliant and so personable/attractive/connected that powerful people will want to see you promoted, typically beyond the hopes and aspirations that they harbor for themselves. The magnitude of this bit of luck is second only to your innate cognitive potential. I give it four heads.
And once you make that list, you will compete with 20 other people who have landed 16 heads. In order to be picked, you must match some profile that the specific moment requires. That profile changes moment by moment, as the political winds swirl and presidential advisors debate what they need: a member of a specific demographic group, a person identified with a cause near and dear to the political base. On top of that, you will not be on the list long. They like young people who will serve for decades. The next administration will have its own list. You are on the list for one presidency, probably not that long. You must be on the list when there is an opening and catch a fickle wind just right to be selected. Three more heads.
Nineteen heads. One more coin to flip. The Senate must approve you, but the political party of the President who picked you is in control. You are at 29,024 feet. To take your place among the 113 others who have scaled that mountain since the founding of the Republic, you need only reach up and touch the summit. Immortality. You are handed the coin.…
Samuel J. Samaro is a partner with Pashman Stein Walder Hayden in Hackensack.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/37/07/d64e3f2f46f68638c705d2add5aa/child-abuse-767x633-2.jpg)
As Trafficking, Hate Crimes Rise in NJ, State's Federal Delegation Must Weigh in On New UN Proposal
4 minute read![Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/ff/16/5f03b14e4e59a036800678f9cb41/piggy-bank-adobestock-588844438-by-michael-767x633.jpg)
Appellate Court's Decision on Public Employee Pension Eligibility Helps the Judiciary
5 minute read![Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/47/11/56138cfd440d8da378402e47d3b2/students-lunch-cafeteria-767x633.jpg)
Where CFPB Enforcement Stops Short on Curbing School Lunch Fees, Class Action Complaint Steps Up
5 minute read!['Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion 'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/29/0b/618f1adc4a98be63b70dd41f95ab/gavel-and-money-767x633.jpg)
'Confusion Where Previously There Was Clarity': NJ Supreme Court Should Void Referral Fee Ethics Opinion
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250