Struck Bicyclist Gets $3.6 Million Jury Verdict in Middlesex
In Gonzalez v. Feldman, a Middlesex County jury awarded $3.6 million on Sept. 21 to a man who was struck by a car while crossing Route 18 in New Brunswick…
October 15, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
In Gonzalez v. Feldman, a Middlesex County jury awarded $3.6 million on Sept. 21 to a man who was struck by a car while crossing Route 18 in New Brunswick on a bicycle.
Abimael Gonzalez, now 42, was crossing the highway near Paulus Boulevard in New Brunswick in the early morning hours of July 15, 2015, when he was struck by a southbound car driven by Leslie Feldman, according to his suit.
Gonzalez's lawyer, Greg Stathis of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison, said Gonzalez was returning home from a friend's house, and acknowledged consuming two beers earlier in the evening, but claimed the road was clear when he crossed. Feldman, a nurse at a local hospital who was working a night shift, was driving within the speed limit and was not using her mobile phone at the time of the accident, and said she never saw Gonzalez before striking him with the left front fender of her car, according to Stathis.
Gonzalez suffered fractures to his skull, right hip, pubic bone and lumbar vertebrae, and a ruptured bladder, requiring orthopedic and abdominal surgery. Gonzalez is a cook at a restaurant in New Brunswick, but he was off the job for four months after the accident and now works a reduced schedule, Stathis said.
Gonzalez's suit went to trial after Feldman's insurance company, New Jersey Manufacturers, offered him a $25,000 settlement, which he rejected, Stathis said. Following four days of trial before Superior Court Judge Patrick Bradshaw, the jury awarded Gonzalez $3.6 million.
Feldman's auto policy limit is $300,000, but Stathis said he is considering a claim that declining to increase the settlement offer beyond $25,000 was done in bad faith.
Rita Barone of Purcell, Mulcahy & Flanagan in Bedminster, who represented Feldman, did not respond to a reporter's call about the verdict.
— Charles Toutant
$1.2M for Auto Accidents
Kreuzer v. Accurso: A Wyckoff woman is to receive $1.2 million as compensation for injuries she sustained in two automobile accidents.
Plaintiff Jeanne Kreuzer, now 54, agreed to the settlements in the two consolidated cases on Sept. 12, said her attorney, Edward Capozzi.
Kreuzer was injured in unrelated accidents on Dec. 19, 2011, and Oct. 28, 2015, said Capozzi, of Roseland's Brach Eichler.
The first accident occurred as she was stopped in traffic on Route 4 in Paramus, Capozzi said. She was struck from behind by a taxi cab owned by Rye Brook Taxi and Airport Services, and driven by an employee, Santo Accurso.
As a result of that accident, Kreuzer sustained back injuries that required cervical injections, Capozzi said.
The second accident occurred when Kreuzer was again stopped in traffic, this time of Goffle Road in Ridgewood, Capozzi said. She was struck from behind by a van owned by Jager Landscaping of Oakland and driven by an employee, Osvaldo Cruz, Capozzi said.
Because of that accident, Kreuzer required surgery to repair exacerbated back injuries resulting from the initial accident, Capozzi said.
Shortly after the initial accident, Kreuzer received $25,000 from the carrier for Rye Brook, which represented the policy limits. Capozzi could not identify the carrier.
Kreuzer then filed lawsuits against Jager's carrier, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., and her own carrier, Plymouth Rock Insurance Co., for underinsured motorist benefits.
The case was scheduled to go to trial in Bergen County before Superior Court Judge Lisa Friscia when they settled, Capozzi said.
Liberty Mutual agreed to pay $800,000. Plymouth Rock agreed to pay $300,000 from the Rye Brook claim and $95,000 from the Jager UIM claim, Capozzi said.
Liberty Mutual retained Frank Barnett of Morristown's Viscomi & Lyons. Plymouth Rock retained John Burke of Burke & Potenza in Parsippany for the Rye Brook matter and Kristine Denning of Harwood Lloyd in Hackensack for the Jager matter. None returned calls.
— Michael Booth
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250