NJ Lawmakers Consider Rules, Urge Task Force for Driverless Cars
The Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology and the Transportation and Independent Authorities committees held a joint hearing Monday to consider whether autonomous vehicles should be allowed to be operated and tested in the state.
October 22, 2018 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
New jersey lawmakers are taking the first steps toward joining the majority of other states in authorizing and regulating autonomous vehicles on the state's roadways.
The Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology and the Transportation and Independent Authorities committees held a joint hearing Monday to consider whether autonomous vehicles, which do not require drivers at the wheel during normal operations, should be allowed to be operated and tested in the state.
The combined committees did not take action on most of the bills, but did recommend that the Legislature create a task force to further consider the issue.
Most other states—most notably Californian, Arizona and Ohio—already have taken steps to authorize and encourage the testing, development and use of driverless vehicles, according to to statistics provided by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
New Jersey is only one of a handful of states that have done nothing to address what is fast becoming a worldwide trend.
The combined committees invited industry experts to testify on the issue.
“What I would love to see is for these vehicles to come to New Jersey and be put to work,” said Alain Kornhauser, a professor of operations research and financial engineering at Princeton University and a longtime proponent of the use of autonomous vehicles.
Kornhauser noted that Waymo, a subsidiary of Google parent company Alphabet, has experienced “exponential growth” since its foundation in 2009.
Josh Fisher, the manager of state government relations for the Association of Global Automakers, said the increased use of autonomous vehicles could result in the reduction of highway deaths and injuries, since most accidents are caused by human error.
“We understand that there is some level of fear and anxiety” about the use of autonomous vehicles,” Fisher said, “but once people understand, the concerns rapidly fall.”
Members of the committee said the Legislature will still have to consider who will be responsible for maintaining insurance coverage for autonomous vehicles if they are involved in accidents.
At present there are three bills under consideration:
- A-1853, sponsored by Assemblywoman Pamela Lampitt, D-Camden, and Assemblyman Daniel Benson, D-Mercer, would authorize the testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads;
- A-4541, sponsored by Assemblyman Andrew Zwicker, D-Monmouth, would require the state Motor Vehicle Commission to create regulations for issuing driver's licenses to owners of autonomous vehicles; and
- A-4573, sponsored by Zwicker and Benson, would create a one-year pilot program to monitor the testing of autonomous vehicles.
The state Senate is not publicly considering the issue at present.
The administration of Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, while expressing interest in the technology, has not taken a firm position on the issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConstruction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250