NJ Lawmakers Consider Rules, Urge Task Force for Driverless Cars
The Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology and the Transportation and Independent Authorities committees held a joint hearing Monday to consider whether autonomous vehicles should be allowed to be operated and tested in the state.
October 22, 2018 at 04:04 PM
3 minute read
New jersey lawmakers are taking the first steps toward joining the majority of other states in authorizing and regulating autonomous vehicles on the state's roadways.
The Assembly Science, Innovation and Technology and the Transportation and Independent Authorities committees held a joint hearing Monday to consider whether autonomous vehicles, which do not require drivers at the wheel during normal operations, should be allowed to be operated and tested in the state.
The combined committees did not take action on most of the bills, but did recommend that the Legislature create a task force to further consider the issue.
Most other states—most notably Californian, Arizona and Ohio—already have taken steps to authorize and encourage the testing, development and use of driverless vehicles, according to to statistics provided by the National Conference of State Legislatures.
New Jersey is only one of a handful of states that have done nothing to address what is fast becoming a worldwide trend.
The combined committees invited industry experts to testify on the issue.
“What I would love to see is for these vehicles to come to New Jersey and be put to work,” said Alain Kornhauser, a professor of operations research and financial engineering at Princeton University and a longtime proponent of the use of autonomous vehicles.
Kornhauser noted that Waymo, a subsidiary of Google parent company Alphabet, has experienced “exponential growth” since its foundation in 2009.
Josh Fisher, the manager of state government relations for the Association of Global Automakers, said the increased use of autonomous vehicles could result in the reduction of highway deaths and injuries, since most accidents are caused by human error.
“We understand that there is some level of fear and anxiety” about the use of autonomous vehicles,” Fisher said, “but once people understand, the concerns rapidly fall.”
Members of the committee said the Legislature will still have to consider who will be responsible for maintaining insurance coverage for autonomous vehicles if they are involved in accidents.
At present there are three bills under consideration:
- A-1853, sponsored by Assemblywoman Pamela Lampitt, D-Camden, and Assemblyman Daniel Benson, D-Mercer, would authorize the testing of autonomous vehicles on public roads;
- A-4541, sponsored by Assemblyman Andrew Zwicker, D-Monmouth, would require the state Motor Vehicle Commission to create regulations for issuing driver's licenses to owners of autonomous vehicles; and
- A-4573, sponsored by Zwicker and Benson, would create a one-year pilot program to monitor the testing of autonomous vehicles.
The state Senate is not publicly considering the issue at present.
The administration of Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy, while expressing interest in the technology, has not taken a firm position on the issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘The Decision Will Help Others’: NJ Supreme Court Reverses Appellate Div. in OPRA Claim Over Body-Worn Camera Footage
5 minute readLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readAppellate Division Tosses Challenge to Rutgers Board Members That Ensnared NJ Lawyer
5 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Einhorn Barbarito; Hartmann Doherty; Lowenstein Sandler; Lindabury McCormick
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250