Kobby Dagan/Shutterstock.comBookmaker William Hill Accuses Rival FanDuel of Copyright Infringement on How-To Manual
"A simple side-by-side comparison of the William Hill copyrighted work against the infringing pamphlet clearly demonstrates how egregious FanDuel has been in its unauthorized copying of the William Hill copyrighted work," the lawsuit says.
October 25, 2018 at 06:07 PM
2 minute read
Only months after sports gambling was legalized in the state, one of the world's largest sports bookmakers has filed a lawsuit against a competitor in New Jersey federal court, accusing it of copyright infringement.
William Hill plc, based in London, filed the lawsuit against FanDuel, based in New York, in U.S. District Court in New Jersey on Oct. 23, accusing FanDuel of misappropriating language used in William Hill betting guides for its own instructional guides.
William Hill's lead attorney, Safia Anan of New York's Olshan Frome Wolosky, did not return a call about the filing.
FanDuel did not respond to an email requesting comment on the suit.
William Hill, which now operates sports books at Monmouth Park Racetrack and Ocean Resort Casino in Atlantic City, publishes a “How to Bet Guide,” which is sort of a primer on how sports betting works and how to place bets.
The lawsuit claims that FanDuel, when it began operating a sports book at the Meadowlands Racetrack in East Rutherford, put out a pamphlet called “FanDuel Sportsbook” and “How to Bet Betting Guide.”
The instructional language, William Hill alleges, was taken almost verbatim from its own betting guide.
“A simple side-by-side comparison of the William Hill copyrighted work against the infringing pamphlet clearly demonstrates how egregious FanDuel has been in its unauthorized copying of the William Hill copyrighted work,” the lawsuit says.
The lawsuit contains what William Hill says are examples of how FanDuel copied its work.
Both companies offer bettors the ability to place wagers in a variety of sports, including football, baseball, basketball, soccer, car racing and hockey.
Sports betting was legalized by New Jersey lawmakers after a May ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a federal law banning the practice in all but a few jurisdictions.
William Hill, in its lawsuit, said the copyright infringement on FanDuel's part was “egregious and willful.” The company is seeking to block FanDuel from further distributing its pamphlets, and to pay for its legal fees.
“FanDuel's acts constitute infringement of William Hill's copyright and exclusive rights under copyright,” the lawsuit claims.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Construction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute read
$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute read
Which Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute read
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
