Bergen County Auto Case Settles on Eve of Trial for $1.63 Million
In Phillips v. Klein, a Teaneck woman is to receive $1.63 million as compensation for injuries she sustained in an auto accident.Plaintiff Lorna…
October 26, 2018 at 06:30 PM
5 minute read
In Phillips v. Klein, a Teaneck woman is to receive $1.63 million as compensation for injuries she sustained in an auto accident.
Plaintiff Lorna Phillips, now 54, agreed to the settlement with the carriers for defendant Juda Klein of Monsey, New York, on Sept. 11, said Phillips' attorney, James Kimball.
The case settled as trial was set to begin before Bergen County Superior Court Judge Robert Polifroni, said Kimball, of Seigel Law in Ridgewood.
The accident occurred on Nov. 10, 2014, as Phillips was driving on Sagamore Avenue in Teaneck, Kimball said. As she approached the intersection with Belle Avenue, her car was struck by a car driven by Klein, who was alleged in the lawsuit to have ignored a stop sign
As a result of the accident, Phillips sustained injuries to her left shoulder and left hip that required surgery involving arthroscopy and a lumbar spine stimulator transplant, Kimball said.
Klein had coverage provided by three carriers—GEICO, his primary carrier, which will pay $250,000; Federal Insurance Co,, which will pay $1.19 million; and Automobile Insurance Co. of Hartford, which will pay $187,500, Kimball said.
The carriers retained Bilal Jaloudi of the Law Offices of Eric Bennett in Hackensack. He did not return a call about the case.
— Michael Booth
$500K for Sidewalk Fall
Thomas v. 378-392 Washington Street Carwash Inc.: A women who broke her arm during a fall on an uneven sidewalk in Newark settled her Essex County suit for $500,000 on Aug. 31.
On May 2, 2016, Evon Thomas was walking near her home on Washington Street when she tripped over a sidewalk slab that was raised 1-1/4 inches, according to her lawyer, Angelo Catanzariti of Corradino & Papa in Clifton.
Thomas, currently 73, broke her right humerus in three places and underwent an internal fixation procedure, which she claimed led to scarring. The suit also claimed neck injuries that required physical therapy and epidural injections. Catanzariti said Thomas has some lingering pain and limited range of motion.
The suit named the owner of the commercial property adjacent to the sidewalk, 378-392 Washington Street Carwash Inc., claiming the owner negligently failed to fix the dangerous sidewalk. There was significant discovery motion practice, during which litigation over a prior fall at that location was discovered, though the defendant denied knowledge of any such prior falls, according to Catanzariti.
The defense ultimately stipulated liability following arbitration, and the matter was set for trial on damages. It settled on the first day of trial, prior to testimony, Catanzariti said.
The defendant's counsel, Kalliopi Kousis of Gallo Vitucci Klar in Hackensack, didn't return a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
Defense Verdict in Ski Resort Case
Carrion v. Mountain Creek Resort, Inc.: A Sussex County jury returned a defense verdict Oct. 17 in a suit by a skier who suffered back injuries after falling at the Mountain Creek Resort in Vernon. Before trial, the plaintiff had sought up to $7 million, according to defense lawyer Samuel McNulty.
Diane Carrion, then 55, an expert skier, was descending on the resort's steepest trail on Feb. 14, 2013, when she slipped and fell due to an icy condition, then veered off the trial and struck a 5-foot-high metal pipe that was intended to connect to snow-making equipment. She sustained fractures to the sacrum, pelvis and T-8 vertebrae, causing her extreme pain and suffering, the suit said.
Carrion claimed in her suit that the ski resort failed to meet its obligation under the New Jersey Ski Statute to warn skiers of icy conditions on the slopes and trails, and that its failure to remove the pipe violated its duty under the statute to monitor and remove hazards.
The slope where Carrion was injured was closed due to icy conditions on the morning of the accident, but was reopened in the afternoon, McNulty said. Carrion claimed that the ice on the slope was a man-made hazard and that the resort was obligated to protect skiers from it. She also alleged that the resort failed to install padded barriers to protect skiers from the protruding pipe. But the defense maintained that skiers should expect to encounter icy conditions at any ski area in the Northeastern U.S. and that the barriers are not used in expert ski areas because they provide no protection to skiers moving at high speeds, according to McNulty. The defense also argued that warnings about ice were printed on lift tickets at the resort. In addition, according to McNulty, Carrion admitted during a deposition that, shortly before her accident, she saw a sign designating the lift she was using “extreme expert terrain only” and warning, “if you are not an expert skier/rider do not attempt this trail.”
Following 14 days of trial before Superior Court Judge David Weaver, the jury found by a 6-0 vote that Carrion failed to prove that Mountain Creek violated the New Jersey Ski Statute.
McNulty tried the case along with John Gaffney. Both are with Hueston McNulty in Florham Park.
John Scura of Scura, Wigfield, Heyer & Stevens in Wayne, who represented Carrion and her husband, said he intends to appeal the verdict. He said he initially demanded $7 million, but in a final settlement conference with the judge, his demand was $3.25 million.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Chicago Federal Court Offers Banks Relief From Illinois' Historic Credit Fee Curbs
- 2Most New Eversheds Sutherland US Partners Are in Atlanta
- 3Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 4Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 5Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250