Rutgers Computer Hacker Ordered to Pay $8.6M in Restitution
"Paras has completely turned his life around, he is now a mature, responsible young man who sincerely regrets his past actions. He will continue to live up to the court's expectations and will work hard to repay the loss to Rutgers," said defense attorney Robert Stahl.
October 26, 2018 at 06:24 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge ordered a 22-year-old convicted of carrying out a now-infamous cyberattack on the Rutgers University computer network to pay $8.6 million in restitution.
Paras Jha of Fanwood had previously pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp of the District of New Jersey to violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act for his part in the attack. Two others also have pleaded guilty in connection with the scheme.
Shipp, sitting in Trenton, on Oct. 26 issued the sentence, which includes six months of home incarceration and 2,500 hours' community service, in addition to paying restitution.
In a release announcing the sentencing, U.S. Attorney for New Jersey Craig Carpenito detailed hacking activities that included generating artificial revenue through advertising fraud. The release said Jha took part in creating “clickfraud” botnets that captured thousands of computers and other devices connected to the internet without their owner's knowledge.
Between November 2014 and September 2016, Jha executed a series of “distributed denial of service” (DDOS) attacks on the networks of Rutgers University, Carpentino said.
“These occur when multiple computers acting in unison flood the internet connection of a targeted computer or computers.” the release said. “Jha's attacks effectively shut down Rutgers University's central authentication server, which maintained, among other things, the gateway portal through which staff, faculty, and students delivered assignments and assessments. At times, Jha succeeded in taking the portal offline for multiple consecutive periods, causing damage to Rutgers University, its faculty, and its students.”
Defense attorney Robert Stahl of Westfield said by email that Jha will be allowed to pay the $8.6 million over time as a 20-year judgment.
The money represents the loss Rutgers claims for the interruption to the university's website and internet services, plus the costs associated with repairs and many upgrades, according to the defense attorney.
“Paras did not commit the offense against Rutgers for money. He derived no money at all. The restitution award is strictly the damages Rutgers claimed,” Stahl said.
“Paras and his entire family are very pleased that the judge took into consideration Paras' extensive cooperation, youth and other relevant sentencing factors to fashion a reasonable sentence,” Stahl said. “Paras has completely turned his life around, he is now a mature, responsible young man who sincerely regrets his past actions. He will continue to live up to the court's expectations and will work hard to repay the loss to Rutgers. He is grateful for the support of his school, employer, the FBI, his family and his attorneys through this extremely stressful time.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNJ Firm Narrowly Avoids Case Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Fed Court
4 minute readOn the Move and After Hours: Meyner and Landis; Cooper Levenson; Ogletree Deakins; Saiber
3 minute readAstraZeneca Files Flurry of Lawsuits to Protect Cancer Treatment Drug
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250