Top Women in Law 2018: Mary-Alice Barrett
Mary-Alice Barrett, assistant general counsel for Genentech Inc., has played a critical role in defense of the long-running Accutane mass tort litigation…
November 02, 2018 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
Mary-Alice Barrett, assistant general counsel for Genentech Inc., has played a critical role in defense of the long-running Accutane mass tort litigation since her time at Genentech parent company Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. She took on responsibility for the litigation in 2008 and is credited with raising the issue of admissibility standards for plaintiff expert scientific testimony—an issue that eventually would come before the New Jersey Supreme Court. In August 2018 the court issued its ruling, shaping the law and reinstating dismissal of some 2,000 Accutane cases in the process. Barrett previously practiced at law firm Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, and in-house at Bristol-Myers Squibb.
What's your single best piece of advice for handling a crisis?
Breathe. And then collaborate with trusted advisers who will help you see the big picture and tell you the truth.
Name a mentor or someone you admire, and why.
Connie Matteo was assigned to be my mentor on my first day at Porzio. Over the years, she has provided excellent guidance, support and counsel. Most importantly, she has become a dear friend.
Best advice you ever got…
Don't be afraid to ask questions and admit “I don't know.”
What has the #MeToo movement meant to the legal profession?
I have a unique perspective because I have reported to women for almost my entire legal career. This means I always believed I had an avenue to report improper and inappropriate conduct. Now, I see two significant issues. First, many people are not aware of the more subtle discrimination, bias and harassment that exists; firms/organizations should be encouraged to openly discuss these issues. By identifying such activities, firms/organizations can develop strategies that reduce or eliminate them and their effects. Second, there are reports of backlash where men avoid working with or mentoring women to “avoid” any issues. In addition to the potential litigation risk by treating women differently than men, this is unfortunate as these women need mentoring, sponsorship and exposure to clients to further their career development. I hope organizations and firms affirmatively encourage male attorneys to mentor and sponsor female attorneys.
In 50 words or less, what does the legal profession need to do to improve opportunities for women lawyers?
Clients can and should drive their counsel to provide opportunities to women lawyers. I want my teams to reflect the diversity of my company and its patients. Such diverse litigation teams are a major factor in our successes.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAppellate Div. Follows Fed Reasoning on Recusal for Legislator-Turned-Judge
4 minute readChiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
5 minute read'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Trending Stories
- 1$7.5M in Punitive Damages Awarded in Product Liability Case
- 2Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 3'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 4Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 5The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250