Appeals Court Affirms 7-Year Sentence for Disbarred Attorney in $100K Theft Case
A three-judge Appellate Division panel in an unpublished decision brushed aside a slew of objections raised by the ex-lawyer, Eugene Lavergne, to how his 2014 trial was handled.
November 07, 2018 at 05:18 PM
3 minute read
A New Jersey appeals court has refused to overturn the conviction and seven-year prison sentence handed to a disbarred Monmouth County attorney and failed political candidate who a jury decided misappropriated more than $100,000 from an estate.
A three-judge Appellate Division panel in an unpublished decision brushed aside a slew of objections raised by the ex-lawyer, Eugene Lavergne, to how his 2014 trial was handled.
While there were errors during the trial made by the judge and prosecutors, none warranted setting aside the conviction for second-degree misappropriation of entrusted property and fourth-degree contempt, wrote Appellate Division Judge Greta Gooden Brown, joined by Judges Marie Simonelli and Michael Haas.
Meanwhile, Lavergne's counsel has vowed to appeal the case further.
Deputy Attorney General Evgeniya Sitnikova, who handled the appeal for the state, issued a statement.
“We are pleased that the Appellate Division affirmed defendant's convictions and sentence. Mr. Lavergne received a fair trial and was justly convicted of abusing the trust placed in him as an attorney by stealing well over $100,000 from his clients. This seven-year prison sentence should deter other attorneys from betraying their fiduciary duties in such an egregious manner,” Sitnikova said.
Lavergne's attorney, Wall solo Robert Pierce, said he was “sort of in shock” from the ruling, given what he said were the numerous trial errors, ranging from the erroneous admission of evidence to issues of prosecutorial conduct.
“We intend to file for certification to the Supreme Court immediately,” Pierce said.
Lavergne, meanwhile, remains free on $85,000 bail on the condition that he not leave the country.
Lavergne was disbarred shortly after his sentence.
Lavergne, while under indictment, ran for the U.S. Senate in 2014 on a combined Democratic-Republican Party ticket, but was handily defeated by Democrat Cory Booker.
He also ran for U.S. Senate in 2012 as the “No Slogan Party” candidate.
Lavergne's legal woes began in July 2006, when Monmouth County Superior Court Judge Thomas Cavanagh Jr. put him in charge of selling a marina in Avon-by-the-Sea.
The marina eventually sold for $800,000 and, after taxes and expenses were deducted, $502,193 was deposited into his attorney trust account, according to the ruling. Cavanagh ordered Lavergne to withhold at least $200,000 while other legal issues were pending.
Over the next several months, authorities said, Lavergne made at least 130 unauthorized withdrawals—totaling more than $108,000—from the trust fund and used the funds for personal purposes, according to the ruling.
At the time, Lavergne said the charges, brought by the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office, were “frivolous.”
He did not present any defense witnesses at his trial, according to the appeals court ruling.
Lavergne had been in ethics trouble before his criminal case. In 2011, the New Jersey Supreme Court censured and kept him on indefinite suspension for failing to surrender files to a client who had fired him.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narrow Path Back From Disbarment: 'You Have to Really Want to Be a Lawyer Again'
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250