Woman Rendered Incontinent After Medical Procedure Settles for $2 Million in Morris County
A woman who developed urinary incontinence after undergoing gynecological surgery performed by a doctor who misstated his credentials agreed to a $2…
November 21, 2018 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
A woman who developed urinary incontinence after undergoing gynecological surgery performed by a doctor who misstated his credentials agreed to a $2 million settlement in her Morris County suit, McMillan v. Littman, on Oct. 30.
Kaitlyn McMillan underwent surgery for a prolapse of the urethra at Specialty Surgery Center in Sparta. Her surgeon, Paul Littman, used a resectoscope to remove most of the urethra after discovering that it had a stricture, said her attorney, Paul da Costa of Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & da Costa in Roseland.
After the procedure, McMillan suffered urinary incontinence and urinary tract infections, the suit claimed. She underwent multiple procedures to reconstruct her urethra but without success, and now she uses a self-catheter to urinate through a stoma in her abdomen, according to da Costa.
Littman claimed he had completed a fellowship in urogynecology but he left that four-year program after three years, da Costa said. McMillan filed suit against Littman, claiming he deviated from acceptable standards of care by performing an excision of a urethral stricture.
The plaintiff experts opined that the stricture removed by Littman was asymptomatic, and no treatment was warranted, da Costa said. The plaintiff also argued that Littman failed to disclose the risk and potential complications of the procedure. Littman said at a deposition that his initial plan did not call for resection of the urethra or use of a resectoscope, and he had never used a resectoscope without supervision, da Costa said.
McMillan, now 23, also sued Specialty Surgical Center, the facility where the operation took place, and two of its adminstrators: physician Donald Mykulak and registered nurse Bonnie Brady. McMillan claimed Mykulak and Brady were negligent in granting credentials and privileges to Littman and failing to discover that he falsified his urogynecology fellowship credential, daCosta said.
The parties agreed to the $2 million settlement after the close of discovery and prior to trial. Littman will pay $1 million toward the settlement, and the surgery center, Mykulak and Brady will jointly pay the other $1 million, da Costa said. The agreement also calls for a “cease and desist” clause in which Littman agrees not to represent himself as having completed fellowship training in urogynecology, daCosta said.
Littman was represented by Craig Combs of Giblin, Combs, Schwartz, Cunningham & Scarpa in Morristown, who has since died. Another attorney at the firm who was involved in the settlement, Christina Scarpa, did not return a call.
Mykulak and the surgery center were represented by Kenneth Brown of Weber Gallagher Simpson Stapleton Fires & Newby in Bedminster, and Brady's lawyer was Matthew Corso of Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney in Princeton. They did not return calls about the case.
— Charles Toutant
|$1.5M in Monmouth County Auto Case
Moore v. T Transporter: A Cliffwood woman will receive $1.5 million for injuries she sustained when her car was struck by a commercial truck.
Plaintiff Susan Moore, now 55, agreed to the settlement with Protective Insurance Co., the carrier for defendants T Transporter Inc. and its driver, Kyle Annese, on Nov. 7, according to Moore's attorney, Norman Hobbie.
Moore was injured on Feb. 11, 2015, as she was driving westbound on West County Line Road in Lakewood, said Hobbie, of Hobbie, Corrigan & DeCarlo in Eatontown.
Moore's car was in the right lane when the T Transporter box truck made an abrupt right turn and struck her car, Hobbie said.
As a result of the accident, Moore sustained orthopedic injuries to her neck and lower back, and disc herniation that required fusion surgery, Hobbie said. She also suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, Hobbie said.
Protective retained Ryan Lang of the Roseland office of Callahan & Fusco. He confirmed the amount of the settlement.
The lawsuit was filed in Monmouth County. No trial date had been set. The matter settled after mediation with C. Judson Hamlin of the Keefe Law Firm in Red Bank, a retired Superior Court judge.
— Michael Booth
|$650K for Truck vs. Car
Noa v. Lavon-Coleman: A driver who suffered neck and back injuries in a collision with a truck agreed to a $650,000 settlement in his suit in federal court in Newark on Oct. 29.
Jose Noa, 39, was driving north on York Street in Elizabeth on May 9, 2014, when he came upon a tractor-trailer that was pulled to the right side of the road. As Noa passed the truck, it suddenly turned left, striking the right side of Noa's vehicle, he claimed.
The driver of the truck, Jamil Lavon-Coleman, maintained that he was waiting to make a left turn when Noa went around him on his left, according to plaintiff lawyer Steven Haddad.
As a result of the accident, Noa underwent fusion with implantation of a plate and screws at L4-L5 and at L5-S1. He was out of work for roughly a year but has recovered, according to Haddad, of the Haddad Law Firm in Woodbridge.
Noa, of Elizabeth, sued Lavon-Coleman, a Baltimore resident, and his employer, Western Express Inc. of Nashville, Tennessee, in Union County Superior Court. Lawyers for the defendants removed the case to federal court.
Following private mediation with Mark Epstein of Hoagland, Longo, Moran, Dunst & Doukas in New Brunswick, a former Superior Court judge, the parties agreed to a $650,000 settlement, to be paid by Western Express, which was self-insured, Haddad said.
Besides Haddad, the plaintiff was represented by Nehal Modi, also of the Haddad firm.
Matthew Bauer of Connell Foley represents the defendants. He did not return a call about the case.
— Charles Toutant
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 2Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 3Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
- 4'Almost an Arms Race': California Law Firms Scooped Up Lateral Talent by the Handful in 2024
- 5Pittsburgh Judge Rules Loan Company's Online Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250