NJ Lawmakers Move Ahead on Permitting the Use of Recreational Pot
The New Jersey legislature took its first major step Monday toward legalizing the recreational use of marijuana by adults.
November 26, 2018 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The New Jersey legislature took its first major step Monday toward legalizing the recreational use of marijuana by adults.
In votes split largely along party lines, a combined meeting of the Senate Budget and Appropriations Committee and the Assembly Appropriations Committee recommended passage of the New Jersey Regulatory and Expungement Aid Modernization Act.
It still must pass both the full Senate and Assembly, but Gov. Phil Murphy, long a proponent of marijuana legalization, has indicated his support for the legislation.
It remains unclear when the legislation will be put up for final votes.
The sponsors are Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Nicholas Scutari, D-Union, who has been pushing for legalization for years; Senate President Stephen Sweeney, D-Gloucester; and Assemblywoman Annette Quijano, D-Union.
Scutari said the bill is likely to be subject to a number of amendments to assuage opponents' concerns—chiefly stiffened penalties for black market marijuana dealers, additional funds for training law enforcement officers and more money to be used for educating youth about the potential dangers of using drugs, including marijuana.
“This is just the right thing to do,” Scutari said. “It's clear that prohibition hasn't worked.”
Scutari noted that marijuana use among minority groups is heavy and that those groups have been particularly hard-hit by enforcement efforts. Those with even minor marijuana convictions often lose their right to vote and to obtain funds for educational purposes and face difficulties in finding jobs.
There is, Scutari said, a racial tinge to marijuana prohibition laws. “In effect, they prohibit minorities from participating” in society, he said.
“The only people who are going to be hurt by this [legislation] are drug dealers,” added Sen. Patrick Diegnan, D-Union.
“This bill will create a strictly regulated system that permits adults to purchase limited amounts of marijuana for personal use. It will bring marijuana out of the underground market where it can be controlled, regulated and taxed, just as alcohol has been for decades,” Scutari said in a separate statement after the vote.
Ten states and Washington, D.C., have legalized recreational marijuana for adults over 21.
There was significant opposition to the bill, chiefly from law enforcement groups and others who claim the legislation is nothing more than a grab for money by lawmakers and a governor who are desperate for additional tax revenues and for venture capitalists looking to make easy money off of users' backs.
“This is not about social justice,” said one of the chief opponents, Sen. Ronald Rice, D-Essex. “It's about money for white investors.”
The combined committees heard more than four hours of testimony from both opponents and supporters, although it appeared clear from the beginning that the sponsors had more than enough votes to recommend passage.
In short, the legislation would permit the possession and personal use of one ounce or less of marijuana for people 21 and over, create a regulatory scheme for what is expected to become a burgeoning industry, and levy a 12 percent tax on a commercial marijuana industry in the state. An extra 2 percent excise tax could be raised for cities and towns that allow marijuana sales businesses to operate within their borders.
Additionally, the legislation also calls for a fast-moving expungement process for those who have been convicted or arrested for possession or distribution of an ounce or less of marijuana.
Under the legislation, home delivery of marijuana would be allowed, as would the creation of lounges where people could gather and smoke marijuana.
Most sections of the bill would take effect within 180 days of enactment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250