Judge Orders Limits on Firm Website's Description of Class Action Suit
A federal judge in New Jersey has ordered a law firm handling a wage class action involving one of the country's largest food services companies to redact information from its website because, the judge ruled, it was misleading.
November 29, 2018 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in New Jersey has ordered a law firm handling a wage class action involving one of the country's largest food services companies to redact information from its website because, the judge ruled, it was misleading.
U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler, sitting in Newark, on Nov. 19 ordered the Chicago-based law firm, Stephan Zouras, to edit the information on its website.
The firm was ordered to make the changes by Thursday. A review of the firm's website Thursday revealed no information about the pending class action at issue, Clarke v. Flik International.
On its website, the Zouras firm posts snippets about class action cases in which it is involved.
In a protective order entered at the defendants' urging, Chesler said some of the information about the Clarke lawsuit that had been posted on the Zouras website was misleading, inaccurate and unbalanced.
“The court has no doubt regarding its authority to require that plaintiff's notice to potential opt-ins as well as his communication related to this collective action be reasonably restricted and tailored to the class and claims, which have been conditionally certified,” Chesler said.
The lead plaintiff in the class action, James Clarke, is alleging that the defendants, food-service company Flik Hospitality Group and parent company Compass Group USA, violated the law concerning unpaid wages for off-the-clock work and for uncompensated costs related to travel and expenses.
Chesler granted partial class certification earlier this year, with conditions. After a hearing, he entered an order outlining what the Zouras firm could say on its website about the lawsuit in its effort to sign on additional class-member clients.
Chesler said the website notice “must be tailored” to reflect that the pool of potential clients should be limited to persons with certain job titles who worked in the companies' Whippany office.
Instead, Chesler said, the Zouras firm posted a snippet saying the lawsuit involved “other Flik and Compass locations” and “hundreds of locations nationwide.”
“It is apparent to the court that the information concerning the lawsuit published on the Stephan Zouras website does not conform in numerous respects to the limitations which the court set forth,” Chesler said.
“The court is satisfied that defendants are indeed entitled to a protective order limiting the information contained on any page or portion of the Stephen Zouras website pertaining to the lawsuit,” Chesler said.
The Zouras firm was represented by one of its own attorneys, David Cohen, who works in the firm's Philadelphia office. He did not return a call seeking comment Thursday.
Flik and Compass turned to Brian Gershengorn of the New York office of Fisher & Phillips. He declined to comment.
Flik is a wholly owned subsidiary of Compass USA, which claims on its website to have 250,000 employees nationwide with 2017 revenues of $17 billion. It lists IBM, United Technologies, SAP Technologies, Louisiana State University and Texas A&M University as being among its major food-service clients.
Compass USA itself is a subsidiary of U.K.-based Compass Group, which says on its website that it employees 500,000 people in more than 50 countries and had 2017 revenues of nearly $30 billion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Troutman Pepper, Claiming Ex-Associate's Firing Was Performance Related, Seeks Summary Judgment in Discrimination Suit
- 2Law Firm Fails to Get Punitive Damages From Ex-Client
- 3Over 700 Residents Near 2023 Derailment Sue Norfolk for More Damages
- 4Decision of the Day: Judge Sanctions Attorney for 'Frivolously' Claiming All Nine Personal Injury Categories in Motor Vehicle Case
- 5Second Judge Blocks Trump Federal Funding Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250