Judge Orders Limits on Firm Website's Description of Class Action Suit
A federal judge in New Jersey has ordered a law firm handling a wage class action involving one of the country's largest food services companies to redact information from its website because, the judge ruled, it was misleading.
November 29, 2018 at 02:08 PM
3 minute read
A federal judge in New Jersey has ordered a law firm handling a wage class action involving one of the country's largest food services companies to redact information from its website because, the judge ruled, it was misleading.
U.S. District Judge Stanley Chesler, sitting in Newark, on Nov. 19 ordered the Chicago-based law firm, Stephan Zouras, to edit the information on its website.
The firm was ordered to make the changes by Thursday. A review of the firm's website Thursday revealed no information about the pending class action at issue, Clarke v. Flik International.
On its website, the Zouras firm posts snippets about class action cases in which it is involved.
In a protective order entered at the defendants' urging, Chesler said some of the information about the Clarke lawsuit that had been posted on the Zouras website was misleading, inaccurate and unbalanced.
“The court has no doubt regarding its authority to require that plaintiff's notice to potential opt-ins as well as his communication related to this collective action be reasonably restricted and tailored to the class and claims, which have been conditionally certified,” Chesler said.
The lead plaintiff in the class action, James Clarke, is alleging that the defendants, food-service company Flik Hospitality Group and parent company Compass Group USA, violated the law concerning unpaid wages for off-the-clock work and for uncompensated costs related to travel and expenses.
Chesler granted partial class certification earlier this year, with conditions. After a hearing, he entered an order outlining what the Zouras firm could say on its website about the lawsuit in its effort to sign on additional class-member clients.
Chesler said the website notice “must be tailored” to reflect that the pool of potential clients should be limited to persons with certain job titles who worked in the companies' Whippany office.
Instead, Chesler said, the Zouras firm posted a snippet saying the lawsuit involved “other Flik and Compass locations” and “hundreds of locations nationwide.”
“It is apparent to the court that the information concerning the lawsuit published on the Stephan Zouras website does not conform in numerous respects to the limitations which the court set forth,” Chesler said.
“The court is satisfied that defendants are indeed entitled to a protective order limiting the information contained on any page or portion of the Stephen Zouras website pertaining to the lawsuit,” Chesler said.
The Zouras firm was represented by one of its own attorneys, David Cohen, who works in the firm's Philadelphia office. He did not return a call seeking comment Thursday.
Flik and Compass turned to Brian Gershengorn of the New York office of Fisher & Phillips. He declined to comment.
Flik is a wholly owned subsidiary of Compass USA, which claims on its website to have 250,000 employees nationwide with 2017 revenues of $17 billion. It lists IBM, United Technologies, SAP Technologies, Louisiana State University and Texas A&M University as being among its major food-service clients.
Compass USA itself is a subsidiary of U.K.-based Compass Group, which says on its website that it employees 500,000 people in more than 50 countries and had 2017 revenues of nearly $30 billion.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllConstruction Worker Hit By Falling Concrete Settles Claims for $2.3M
4 minute read$113K Sanction Award to Law Firm at Stake: NJ Supreme Court Will Consider 'Unsettled Law' Frivolous Litigation Question
4 minute readWhich Outside Law Firms Are Irreplaceable, and Which Should Have Gotten the Ax Years Ago?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 2Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
- 36th Circuit Judges Spar Over Constitutionality of Ohio’s Ballot Initiative Procedures
- 4On The Move: Polsinelli Adds Health Care Litigator in Nashville, Ex-SEC Enforcer Joins BCLP in Atlanta
- 5After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250