Union County Jury Awards $20 Million in Fetal Brain Injury Case
A Union County jury returned a $20 million verdict in a medical malpractice suit, Tapia v. Alam, on Oct. 24, though the plaintiff is to recover…
December 07, 2018 at 05:45 PM
5 minute read
A Union County jury returned a $20 million verdict in a medical malpractice suit, Tapia v. Alam, on Oct. 24, though the plaintiff is to recover $6 million due to the jury's allocation of 70 percent of the fault to a defendant who settled confidentially before trial.
The jury issued the $20 million verdict against two doctors in a suit claiming their failure to promptly treat fetal distress resulted in the birth of an infant with cerebral palsy.
Maria Tapia gave birth to twins in 2011. One of the infants, a girl named Kylie, developed intrauterine growth retardation, which caused her to lose weight because of insufficient nutrition, according to the suit.
A technician working for maternal fetal medicine specialist Garry Frisoli discovered Kylie's condition in an ultrasound test in the 33rd week of pregnancy, but the report sat in Frisoli's office for four days before it was faxed to Tapia's obstetrician, the suit claimed.
Tapia's lawyer, Dennis Donnelly of the Donnelly Law Firm in Summit, contended that the proper standard of care was to phone the obstetrician and patient immediately after the test results were received. During the delay, Kylie stopped breathing and suffered brain damage, the suit claimed.
Kylie's parents, Maria and Octavio Tapia, sued Frisoli and the obstetrician, who settled on confidential terms four weeks before trial.
Frisoli contended that his actions met the standard of care for a maternal fetal medicine specialist, and he claimed the obstetrician had been negligent. Frisoli also said the real cause of Kylie's condition was a pre-existing disease: neonatal hemocromatosis.
The jury awarded $11 million for Kylie's future care costs, $8 million for her disability and loss of enjoyment of life, and $1 million to her parents for loss of consortium. The jury found the obstetrician was 70 percent at fault, and Frisoli was 30 percent at fault.
Kylie, now 11, has profound brain damage, cannot speak and uses a wheelchair, according to Donnelly.
Frisoli's attorney, Michael Keating of Dughi, Hewit and Domalewski in Cranford, said he has filed a motion for a new trial.
— Charles Toutant
|$1.45M for 3 Auto Accidents
Hall v. Jemmi Jon: A man involved in three different auto accidents was paid the last of a $1.45 million settlement in September in a consolidated Hudson County case.
Plaintiff Ronald Hall, currently 58 and a retired police officer, was involved in accidents on Nov. 23, 2011, May 29, 2013, and Oct. 19, 2015, and the first and third accidents led to under-insured motorist claims.
According to the lawyer, Damon Vespi of the Vespi Law Firm in Totowa, after the first accident, which occurred in Paterson, Hall settled with the tortfeasor for $27,500, and after the third accident, which occurred in Wayne, he settled with the tortfeasor for $20,000. UIM claims against his own carrier, New Jersey Manufacturers, followed those accidents.
The second accident occurred when Hall was on Newark Avenue in Jersey City, stopped at a light at Summit Avenue, and was struck from behind by a commercial van owned by Solex Inc., according to Vespi.
Hall sustained neck and back injuries, and aggravations to those injuries, in the three accidents, leading to chiropractic care and physical therapy, epidurals at the lumbar and cervical spine, and surgeries at the lumbar and cervical levels, according to Vespi, who noted that Hall has ongoing pain and requires further medical treatment.
The defendants challenged causation, though liability was not contested in connection with the second accident, Vespi said.
Earlier this year, according to Vespi, Hall settled with with New Jersey Manufacturers—for $70,000, in connection with the first accident, and for $480,000, on the third accident—and for $850,000 with Soles Inc. The total settlement, including the previous payments from tortfeasors in the under-insured motorist cases, was $1.45 million.
The resolution in the Solex case came during mediation with Paul Vichness of Mandelbaum Salsburg in West Orange, a retired Superior Court judge.
New Jersey Manufacturers was represented by Joseph Campbell of McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter in Morristown, and Solex, by Lisa DeRogatis of William Staehle's Morristown firm. Neither returned a call seeking comment.
— David Gialanella
|$761,500 Verdict in Middlesex Auto Case
Martinez v. North Branch LLC: A Middlesex County jury has awarded an Old Bridge man $761,500 as compensation for injuries he sustained when his car was rear-ended by a tractor trailer.
The jury awarded $761,500 to plaintiff Angel Martinez, 48, and his wife, Gina, on Oct. 30 after finding defendant North Branch LLC and its owner and driver, Ronald Slagel, negligent and liable for Martinez's injuries, said Martinez's attorney, John Molinari.
Martinez was injured on Dec. 14, 2015, as he was exiting the New Jersey Turnpike at Interchange 13 in Elizabeth, said Molinari, of Chatham's Blume Forte Fried Zerres & Molinari.
Martinez's car was stopped at a traffic light when it was struck by the North Branch tractor trailer, Molinari said.
As a result of the accident, Martinez sustained a fractured thoracic spine, an arterial herniation, and aggravations to existing neck and back injuries that required surgery, Molinari said.
The jury awarded Martinez $700,000, and his wife $35,000 in a per quod claim. The remainder of the award was for unpaid medical expenses, Molinari said.
Superior Court Judge Thomas McCloskey presided over the trial.
Molinari said the award does not include prejudgment interest, which would increase the total award to about $800,000.
North Branch's carrier, Nationwide Insurance Co., assigned the case to in-house counsel Robert Pettoni of Juengling & Urciuoli in Woodbridge. He did not return a call seeking comment.
— Michael Booth
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250