Hangar Collapse at Morristown Airport Yields $5.3 Million Settlement for Injured Worker
A former steel worker from Toms River will receive $5.3 million as compensation for injuries he sustained when an under-construction airport hangar…
December 14, 2018 at 05:00 PM
6 minute read
A former steel worker from Toms River will receive $5.3 million as compensation for injuries he sustained when an under-construction airport hangar where he was working collapsed. The case is Collier v. Airport Road Construction.
The plaintiff, Richard Collier, now 36, and the carriers for the three defendants contributing to the settlement agreed to the settlement on Nov. 15, said Collier's attorney, Raymond Gill Jr.
The lawsuit was filed in Middlesex County Superior Court and was scheduled to go to trial in January, said Gill, of Gill & Chamas in Woodbridge. The case had been managed by Superior Court Judge Vincent LeBlon.
Collier was injured on Jan. 16, 2015, while working on the construction of the hangar at Morristown Municipal Airport. The hangar was being built by Airport Road Construction; a subsidiary and general management company, Airport Road Construction Management; Collier's employer, subcontractor 360 Steel Erectors; and several other subcontractors, Gill said.
When the structure collapsed, Collier fell about 40 feet to the ground, according to the lawsuit, which alleged that the collapse occurred because the building had not been properly braced.
Collier sustained multiple pelvic fractures, multiple right leg fractures, rib fractures and a right leg popliteal injury, all of which required surgeries to repair, Gill said, adding that Collier has been declared disabled and has not been able to return to work.
Travelers Insurance Co. provided coverage for the Airport Road defendants, while Western World Insurance Co. provided coverage for Monmouth Equipment Sales. Gill declined to provide a breakdown as to how much each carrier will pay of the $5.3 million sum.
Airport Road Construction Management was represented by Douglas Sanchez of the Woodcliff Lake office of Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet. William Staehle, who heads a firm in Morristown, represented Airport Road Construction. Carl Perrone of Iaciofano & Perrone in Morristown represented Monmouth Equipment Sales. None returned calls about the case.
Collier's award will be offset by a $700,000 workers' compensation lien, Gill noted.
— Michael Booth
|Ocean Auto Case Settles For $1.9M
Bodner v. Wright: A woman who claimed her spinal condition was worsened in a rear-end accident settled her Ocean County suit for $1.9 million on Nov. 28.
On July 18, 2013, Donna Bodner, then 38, was sitting in traffic in her car on Route 35 North in Wall Township when another car, driven by defendant Madeline Wright, struck her from behind, pushing Bodner's car into the vehicle in front of her. The suit claimed the impact aggravated pre-existing conditions in Bodner's cervical and lumbar spine, according to the attorneys involved in the case.
Bodner underwent a one-level disc replacement to treat a disc herniation at the cervical level, and a one-level laminectomy to treat a disc bulge and herniation at the lumbar level, said her lawyer, Nicholas Leonardis of Stathis & Leonardis in Edison. Bodner underwent another procedure to correct a spinal fluid leak that developed after the first two surgeries, Leonardis said.
The parties went through expert discovery and settled on Nov. 28, shortly before a trial scheduled for Dec. 3 before Ocean County Superior Court Judge Mark Troncone. Wright's auto carrier, New Jersey Manufacturers, paid $490,00 of a $500,000 policy, with the difference having already been paid out on property damage, and her excess auto carrier, Cumberland Insurance, paid $1.41 million, according to Leonardis and Michael Kelly of Ronan, Tuzzio & Giannone in Tinton Falls, who was retained by NJM to represent Wright. Kelly confirmed the settlement.
Defense experts contended that Bodner's spinal condition and the need for medical treatment were attributable to the pre-existing condition and not to the accident, the lawyers said.
Bodner received treatment prior to the accident, but the treatment was conservative, Leonardis said.
Joseph Murray of Zimmerer, Murray, Conyngham, & Kunzier in Manasquan, who represented Cumberland Insurance in the settlement negotiations only, didn't return a call about the case.
— David Gialanella
|No-Cause in Middlesex Auto Case
Garcia v. Allstate Insurance Co.: A Middlesex County jury on Oct. 5 returned a defense verdict in an uninsured-motorist claim.
According to counsel in the case, plaintiff Xiomara Reynoso Garcia on June 18, 2014, was stopped on Watson Avenue in Perth Amboy, when a minivan in front of her backed up and struck the front of her sedan. The minivan had backed up because of construction taking place on the road. Garcia claimed multiple permanent injuries.
The motorist who struck Garcia was uninsured. As a result, Garcia sued her insurers, Allstate Insurance Co. and Government Employees Insurance Co., seeking to recover her uninsured-motorist policies. She had a $300,000 policy with Allstate, and a $100,000 policy with GEICO. The insurers stipulated to liability, and the case was tried on causation.
Garcia, a nurse, was taken by ambulance to an emergency room, examined and released. She later complained of pain to her neck, low back, right shoulder and right wrist, and received chiropractic treatment for a year and a half. She was diagnosed with herniations at C5-6 and C6-7; bulging at L5-S1; an aggravation of a pre-existing arthritis in her right, dominant shoulder; and a tear of the triangular fibrocartilage complex in her right wrist. She was treated with injections. Garcia's orthopedic expert causally related her injuries and treatment to the accident and determined that Garcia would require future surgical intervention. Garcia claimed ongoing shoulder and spinal pain and limitations that interfered with her job duties. She sought damages for future pain and suffering.
The defense's orthopedic expert examined Garcia and said her MRI films showed degenerative findings in the cervical and lumbar spine, and no wrist or shoulder issues. The expert said there were no objective evidence of any permanent injury.
Following a four-day trial before Superior Court Judge Lisa M. Vignuolo, the jury by a 7-1 vote rendered a defense verdict. It determined that Garcia's injuries were not permanent within the meaning of the verbal tort threshold.
Garcia was represented by Michelle M. Tullio of Garces Grabler LeBrocq; Allstate, by Frederic J. Regenye of the Law Offices of Kenneth N. Lipstein; GEICO, by Darren C. Kayal of Rudolph & Kayal.
*Editor's Note: This report is based on information that was provided by GEICO's counsel. Plaintiff's counsel and Allstate's counsel did not respond to the reporter's phone calls.
— Adapted from VerdictSearch reports.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves $667K Settlement Against Independence Blue Cross for Unpaid, Pre-Shift Computer Work
4 minute readTurning the Tables: Defense Litigators Embrace Lawsuits, Alleging Fraud at Plaintiffs Shops
6 minute readTitle Insurance Agency on Hot Seat Over Homebuyer Fees, Alleged Kickbacks
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250